Thursday, November 6, 2008

The AIDS virus: Made in the USA?

By Jerry Mazza
Online Journal Contributing Writer

October 26, 2005—You mean AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome) didn’t come from a green monkey that bit a black African on the ass? Are you lying to us again, Uncle Sam? I think so.

In fact, on July 29, 1969, only days after the Department of Defense (DOD) asked for $10 million from Congress to fund the development of a “synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired . . ." on that day, the chairman of the Republican Task Force on Earth Resources and Population, the Honorable George H. W. Bush, U.S. Representative from Texas, 7th District (1967–71), stressed the pressing need for population control activities to fend off “a growing Third World crisis.” Imagine.

Here is the linked text of the Dept. of Defense request for Appropriation for 1970, HB 15090, from page 129. Quoted is Dr. MacArthur from said Pentagon, speaking to Robert L.F. Sikes, Florida, about the need for the above mentioned “synthetic biological agent” [italics mine].

There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to mention. One is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and eminent biologists believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired.

Mr. Sikes. Are we doing any work in that field?

Dr. MacArthur. We are not.

Mr. Sikes.. Why not? Lack of money or lack of interest?

Dr. MacArthur. Certainly not lack of interest.

Mr. Sikes. Would you provide for our records information on what would be required, what the advantages of such a program would be. the time and the cost involved?

Dr. MacArthur. We will be very happy to.

The information follows:

The dramatic progress being made in the field of molecular biology led us to investigate the relevance of this field of science to biological warfare. A small group of experts considered this matter and provided the following observations:

All biological agents up to the present time are representatives of naturally occurring disease. and are thus known by scientists throughout the world. They are easily available to qualified scientists for research. either for offensive or defensive purposes.

Within the next 5 to 10 years. it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.

A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 5 years at the total cost of $10 million.

It would be very difficult to establish such a program. Molecular biology is a relatively new science. There are not many highly competent scientists in the field. Almost all are in university laboratories. And they are generally adequately supported from sources other than DOD. However, it was considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National Academy of Sciences - National Research Council (NAS—NRC).

The matter was discussed with the NAS-NRC. and tentative plans were made to initiate the program. However. decreasing funds in CB [chemical-biowarfare]. growing criticism of the CB. program, and our reluctance to involve the NAS NRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the past 2 years.

It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaken lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations. On the other hand, without the sure scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible. and an understanding of the ways it could be done, there is little that can be done to devise defensive measures. Should an enemy develop it there is little doubt that this is an important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there is no adequate . . .

And so on. And thus spake Dr MacArthur. And the $10 million appropriation was granted. And it worked, perhaps the beginning of the end.

Enter Dr. Robert Strecker

Flash forward to 1983. Dr. Robert Strecker of Los Angeles, a practicing gastroenterologist with a Ph.D. in pharmacology, is hired as a consultant to work on a health care proposal for an HMO of the Security Pacific Bank, concerning coverage costs in the event any of 30,000 employees came down with AIDS. Along with the help of his brother, Theodore, a lawyer, the two compiled extensive research of the epidemic which ultimately became The Strecker Memorandum.

In it, Dr. Strecker indicated that the AIDS virus was in fact developed by the National Cancer Institute, in cooperation with the World Health Organization (WHO), in a laboratory at Ft. Dietrick in Maryland. From 1970–74, this laboratory facility was part of the U.S. Army’s germ warfare unit, known as the Army Infectious Disease Unit, or Special Operations Division, also referred to as the Army’s Chemical Biological Warfare Laboratory. Post 1974, the facility was renamed the National Cancer Institute (NCI). According to researcher William Cooper (former Navy Intelligence), noted in Larry Jamison’s article Is The AIDS Virus Man Made?, this work was supervised by the CIA under a project called MK-NAOMI. [To get to this site click link, then “All News,” then “Next page”]

Dr. Strecker has also traced some of the research and researchers at Ft. Dietrick/NCI to a group of Japanese scientists captured at WW II’s end and given amnesty in exchange for information on racial and ethnic bio-weaponry, their research dating back to 1930. What’s more, expatriated Russian scientists were brought in to help as well.

Dr. Strecker, one of the original and foremost authorities on the AIDS virus, found that the virus creation was conducted under the leadership of Dr. Robert Gallo, who later claimed to discover the virus. Dr. Gallo and his team created the AIDS virus by combining the bovine (cattle) leukemia virus and visna (sheep) virus, and injecting them into human tissue cultures.

They discovered, as Strecker did, that bovine leukemia virus is lethal to cattle, but not to humans. And the visna virus is deadly to sheep, but not to man. However, when combined, they produce a retro-virus that can change the genetic composition of the cells they enter. In fact, as Larry Jamison points out, early field tests on prison convicts led to sickness then death, which inspired Gallo and friends to bigger and more terrible things, including injecting brothers and sisters with the tainted vaccine to see who died first. This was done to study HLA (human leukocyte antigen processing), to see how related people reacted. Frighteningly, whole families got sick at once! And there was worse to come.

The AIDS retro-virus works, as Dr. Strecker states, by causing the destruction of the immune system, fundamentally the body's white blood or T-cells essential to the effectiveness of the immune system particularly against opportunistic infections diseases. The B-cells deal with more benign, bacterial infections. AZT, the drug which is a kind of junk food that starves the AIDS virus, often kills the patient as well. It provides dubious consolation.

Predictably, when Robert and Theodore tried to share their findings with national, state and local authorities, they received only two responses. On August 11, 1988, Ted Strecker, was found shot to death in his home in Springfield, Missouri. The death was ruled a suicide, in spite of the fact that Dr. Robert Strecker had spoken to his brother on the phone the night before, and Ted was both healthy and in good spirits. On September 12, 1988, the lone political official who had responded to the Streckers’ findings, Illinois State Representative Douglas Huff of Chicago, was found dead in his home. The autopsy claimed he died of a stroke as a result of an overdose of cocaine and heroin. Huff had been an outspoken supporter of Dr. Strecker’s work to publicize what was in essence an AIDS cover-up.

Dr. Strecker himself is said to have “gone underground” about five years ago. Yet copies of his Strecker Memorandum are available on DVD and VHS. His passion and massive knowledge have not faded since 1988 when the piece was produced. See it if you can.

The common disinformation on AIDS that Strecker fought was the claim that AIDS origin came from a green monkey biting a black man’s backside in Africa. Strecker and a number of virologists pointed out that the AIDS virus doesn’t appear naturally in any animal. Plus, it would have been impossible to reach the point of millions infected from a single episode. More likely, they said, if the virus had come from green monkeys, it would have surfaced with the Pygmies, who are closer to them, and use them as a food source. Ironically, Pygmies contracted AIDS later on when they had intercourse with prostitutes in cities, where the AIDS virus first appeared, not in the jungle.

Also, concerning green monkeys, Dr. William Campbell Douglass, MD, writes in 1987 in W.H.O. Murdered Africa : “This is the origin of the green monkey theory. The polio vaccine was grown on green monkey kidney cells and the geniuses who brought us polio vaccine said: ‘We got away with it once so let's use it again.’ But they didn't get away with it and in spite of the fact that polio was rapidly disappearing without any medical intervention, 64 million Americans were vaccinated with SV-40 contaminated vaccine in the 60s. An increase in cancer of the brain, possibly multiple sclerosis and God only knows what else is the tragic result. The delay between vaccination and the onset of cancer with this virus is as long as 20–30 years. Ninteen sixty-five plus 20 equals 1985. Get the picture?”

Why, Where and When the AIDS Epidemic First Reared its Head

In 1972, under the auspices of the World Health Organization (WHO), there was a massive vaccination program for smallpox, literally for millions of Africans. Strecker and others believe that the smallpox vaccine laced with the HIV/AIDS virus was given the population, which was mostly black, poor, and part of that startlingly growing African population that GHW Bush, among many elites, the Rockefeller family, the Club of Rome crowd and Bilderbegers, had been concerned with in 1969, and back to 1965, when “the Club” was formed. The intent was to achieve their awful goal—of reducing the world’s population by 75 percent—as mentioned in The Modern History Project. This is the main reason the AIDS pandemic occurred almost simultaneously in Haiti, Brazil, Japan, and the United States, as well as Central Africa.

As Jamison tells us, “There was a book in 1968 titled The Population Bomb, by Dr. Paul Ehrlich that had a very telling paragraph on page 17 that probably tells us the key thinking that was behind the decision. Dr. Ehrlich says ‘in summary, the world’s population will continue to grow as long as the birth rate exceeds the death rate; it’s as simple as that. When it stops growing or starts to shrink, it will mean that either the birth rate has gone down or the death rate has gone up or a combination of the two. Basically, then there are only two kinds of solutions to the population problem. One is a birth rate solution (remember the ZPG—Zero Population Growth—movement?) The other is a death rate solution in which ways to raise the death rate—war, famine, pestilence—find us. The problem could have been avoided by population control, in which mankind consciously adjusted the birth rate so that a ‘death rate solution’ did not have to occur.’" How thoughtful of them all.

Jamison goes on to say: “The late William Cooper, in his excellent book Behold A Pale Horse notes that Dr. Ehrlich’s wife, Anne, is a member of the Club Of Rome, a think tank group that produced a computer model called Global 2000 which not only outlined the recommendations for AIDS, including a special prophylactic for the ruling elite, and a cure at the very same time which is to be released to the survivors when it is decided enough people have died. According to Cooper, the Global 2000 plan was developed at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and then presented to President Carter. Cooper’s research determined that the order to proceed with the plan ‘was given by the policy committee of the Bilderberg Group in Switzerland.’”

He adds, “The Bilderbergers . . . are a powerful alliance of elite world political leaders and international financiers. . . . In his book, Cooper also mentions the ‘Haig-Kissinger depopulation policy which has taken over various levels of government and in fact is determining U.S. Policy. The planning organization operates outside the White House and directs its entire efforts to reduce the world’s population by 2 billion people through war, famine and any other means necessary.’ Active policies of our State Department go beyond the implementation of AIDS, because Cooper mentions the existence of the office of Population Affairs whose Latin American case officer Thomas Ferguson actually made the statement that ‘There is a single theme behind all of our work: we must reduce population levels. Either they do it our way through nice clean methods or they will get the kind of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut.'" That ‘messy and clean’ language has a familiar ring to it.

And in fact, on May 11, 1987, as The Modern History Project, Jamison, and others point out, no less than the London Times broke the story “Smallpox Vaccine ‘Triggered AIDS Virus.’” It was written by Science Editor Pearce Wright, who, challenged by independent investigators' research, went on to tie the World Health Organization’s mass vaccination program to the AIDS outbreak. Since Central (Sub-Saharan) Africa was the locus of the program, it has tragically become the most hard-hit area of the world. The London Times article, which spread like wildfire over Europe, never touched the shores of America. The story was buried like the first AIDS victim.

The irony is that AIDS is considered a heterosexual disease in Africa, while in America it has been stigmatized as a ‘gay’ disease. The dark heart of that matter begins in 1969, with a Dr. W. Schmugner, a Polish physician educated in Russia, who came to America where he became head of the New York City Blood Bank. He established guidelines for a Hepatitis B vaccine study, in which only “promiscuous males,” ages 20 to 40 were included in the study, managing to somehow single out only gays.

In 1978, more than a thousand “promiscuous homosexual” males were the victims of this “experimental” Hepatitis B vaccination, sponsored by the National Institute of Health (NIH) and Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Since the vaccine was not produced from human tissue culture, it’s impossible to have an accidental contamination. In plain language, the AIDS virus was intentionally laced into the Hep B vaccine. By 1981, the CDC claimed that only 6 percent of the Hep B vaccine recipients were infected with AIDS. In 1984, the truth was outed: the number was 64 percent. That’s right, 64 percent. Not surprisingly, these Hep B vaccines studies are now under lock and key at the No Justice Department in Washington, DC. And no one can see them. No, no, no, not you, not you, not you.

Helping to Further Spread the Disease

To help the disease really dig into the population, vital information was additionally covered-up. Emphasis was put on the prime cause of AIDS infection as the exchange of body fluid through sexual activity and intravenous drug use. This gave birth to a campaign for using clean unused needles as well as condoms. Lovely. The fact is condom use is not a guarantee against contracting the disease. One AIDS virion (a virus particle with outer coat intact) is 500 times smaller than the smallest sperm and 10 times smaller than the smallest hole in a condom and therefore can pierce it. Failure rates of 30–50 percent have been noted, and condom quality itself is under scrutiny. Nevertheless, this is not, I repeat, not a recommendation to anyone not to use a condom.

What’s more, the risk of casual contact has been understated. I don’t mean to anger anyone here or bail on the afflicted, but AIDS is highly contagious. There is hard evidence, which Strecker mentioned, that the AIDS virus can survive on a dry petri dish for 7 days, and up to 15 days in a wet environment. Incubation in a host can last for 10 to 15 years before there is noticeable sign of illness. This means a carrier could unknowingly pass on the disease in that time. It’s a painful proposition all around, including the caution of Professor William Haseltine of Harvard Medical School: “Anyone who tells you categorically that AIDS is not contracted by saliva is not telling you the truth. AIDS may in fact be transmissible by tears, saliva, bodily fluids, and mosquito bites.”

Whether you agree with the above or not, the larger context is that this pox, this abomination, was created and spread consciously by the United States government against black heterosexual populations and then gay white populations, and then spread to populations at large around the world. This mass-murder has already dwarfed the holocaust, in which six million people were murdered with industrial technology. The evil geniuses behind this virus have bio-engineered an organism that multiples 100 times faster than influenza. There are more than 180 different AIDS viruses and 300 strains, which makes blood testing meaningless. Strecker’s number for possible AIDS viruses was 9,000 (base pairs on the genome) to the fourth power.

In Conclusion for Now

The notion of a single vaccine to deal with all the permutations is impossible, according to Strecker, Dr. Campbell Douglass, and other doctors. What’s more, UN statistics, to the extent that they can be trusted, approximate that:

* People living with HIV number 39.4 million . . .

* New HIV infections in 2004 were 4.9 million . . .

* Deaths due to AIDS in 2004 were 3.1 million . . .

Avert.Org puts the total number of people living with AIDS at 39.4 million.

Concerning total AIDS deaths, Dr. Campbell Douglass writes: “Dr. Strecker points out that even if the African green monkey could transmit AIDS to humans, the present known amount of infection in Africa makes it statistically impossible for a single episode, such as a monkey biting someone on the butt, to have brought this epidemic to this point [1987]. The doubling time of the number of people infected, about every 14 months, when correlated with the first known case and the present known number of cases, prove beyond a doubt that a large number of people had to have been infected at the same time. Starting in 1972 with the first case from our mythical monkey and doubling the number infected from the single source you get only a few thousand cases. From 1972 to 1987 is 15 years or 180 months. If it takes 14 months to double the number of cases then there would have been 13 doublings, one then 2, then 4, then 8, etc. In 15 years, from a single source of infection there would be about 8,000 cases in Africa, not 75 million. [That’s his bottom line then for Africa alone] We are approaching World War II mortality statistics here—without a shot being fired.”

Thus, we are faced with a species-killer, a global war on humanity, silently out-pacing anything but all-out nuclear conflagration. To those of us in North America, to those of us who are healthy (we hope), these figures, this plague, seem distant often, happening to others, a subject already talked to death. Unless light can continue to be shed on AIDS soon, even from some dark figure among those who perpetuated it, where is the future and how do we take life today for granted tomorrow? In the haze of a television culture, of endless ballgames, “reality” shows, sitcoms, apocalypse movies, and romantic comedies, where is the light? AIDS was man made in the USA, and is not God’s wrath on gays, Africans, Latinos, or women, as various crackpots would have us believe. AIDS is about all of us and our generations surviving the crass dementia of some ruling class. Like the virus, the enemy is within the social body, feasting on it. It’s time, one way or the other, to turn this dark light and its ops out.

For Additional Information:

Google: Gay Cancer, Emerging Viruses and AIDS—The Possible Connection Between Biowarfare Experimentation and the New Epidemic of Immunosuppression and Cancer, by Alan Cantwell, Jr. M.D. Or look for any of the good doctor’s outstanding essays or books on AIDS.

AIDS Genocide: The Crime That Dare Not Speak Its Name!

Is AIDS Man-Made? This is a transcript of an interview in Los Angeles on KPFA’s radio show This Way Out, with Dr. Robert Strecker and Dr. Allen Cantwell, broadcast 2/5/90. Pardon its typos, catch its truth.

Jerry Mazza is a freelance writer who resides I New York. Reach him at

The History of the Development of AIDS

Chapter Excerpt from “State Origin: The Evidence of the Laboratory Birth of AIDS”
by Boyd E. Graves, J.D.

The true history of the origin of AIDS can be traced throughout the 20th Century and back to 1878. On April 29 of that year the United States passed a “FEDERAL QUARANTINE ACT”.

The United States began a significant effort to investigate “causes” of epidemic diseases. In 1887, the effort was enhanced with the mandate of the U.S. “LABORATORY OF HYGIENE”. This lab was run by Dr. Joseph J. Kinyoun, a deep rooted-racist, who served the eugenics movement with dedication.

Two years later, 1889, we were able to identify “mycoplasmas”, a transmissible agent, that is now found at the heart of human diseases, including (AIDS) HIV.

In 1893, we strengthened the Federal Quarantine Act and suddenly there was an explosion of polio.

In 1898, we knew we could use mycoplasma to cause epidemics, because we were able to do so in cattle, and we saw it in tobacco plants.

In 1899, the U.S. Congress began investigating “leprosy in the United States”.

In 1902, We organized a “Station for Experimental Evolution” and we were able to identify diseases of an ethnic nature.

In 1904, we used mycoplasma to cause an epidemic in horses.

In 1910, we used mycoplasma to cause an epidemic in fowl/birds.

In 1917, we formed the “Federation of the American Society for Experimental Biology” (FASEB).

In 1918, the influenza virus killed millions of unsuspecting. It was a flu virus modified with a bird mycoplasma for which human primates had no “acquired immunity”.

In 1921, lead eugenics philosopher, Betrand Russell, publicly supported the “necessity for “organized” plagues” against the Black population.

In 1931, we secretly tested African Americans and we tested AIDS in sheep.

In 1935, we learned we could crystallize the tobacco mycoplasma, and it would remain infectious.

In 1943, we officially began our bio-warfare program. Shortly thereafter, we were finding our way to New Guinea to study mycoplasma in humans.

In 1945, we witnessed the greatest influx of foreign scientists in history into the U.S. biological program. Operation Paperclip will live in infamy as one of the darkest programs of a twisted parallel government fixated on genocide.

In 1946, the United States Navy hired Dr. Earl Traub, a notorious racist biologist.
A May appropriations hearing confirms the existence of a “secret” biological weapon.

In 1948, we know that the United States confirmed the endorsement of “devising a scheme” in which to address the issue of overpopulation in certain racial groups. State Department’s George McKennan’s memo will forever illuminate the eugenics mendacity necessary for genocide of millions of innocent people.

In 1949, Dr. Bjorn Sigurdsson isolates the VISNA virus. Visna is man made and shares some “unique DNA” with HIV. See, Proceedings of the United States, NAS, Vol. 92, pp. 3283 - 7, (April 11, 1995).

In 1951, we now know our government conducted its first virus attack on African Americans. Crates in Pennsylvania were tainted to see how many Negro crate handlers in Virginia would acquire the placebo virus.. They were also experimentally infecting sheep and goats. According to author Eva Snead, they also held their first world conference on an AIDS-like virus.

In 1954, Dr. Bjorn Sigurdsson publishes his first paper on Visna virus and establishes himself as the “Grandfather of the AIDS virus.” He will encounter competition from Dr. Carlton Gajdusek.

In 1955, they were able to artificially assemble the tobacco mosaic virus. Mycoplasmas will forever be at the heart of the U.S. biological warfare program

In 1957, future U.S. president, Rep Gerald Ford and others gave the U.S. Pentagon permission to aggressively deploy offensive biological agents. There are no recorded cases of AIDS prior to the 1957 creation of “Special Operation-X.” (The SOX) program served as the immediate prototype program for the Special Virus program to begin in 1962.

By 1960, Nikita Kruschev had been let in on the biological weapon. His 1960 statement will long reflect the arrogance of the secret blend of communism and democracy. The two countries would go to a November 1972 agreement to cull the Black Population.

In 1961, scientist Haldor Thomar publishes that viruses cause cancer. In 1995, he and Carlton Gajdusek informed the National Academy of Sciences that “the study of visna in sheep would be the best test for candidate anti-HIV drugs.”

In 1962, under the cover of cancer research, the United States charts a path to commit premeditated murder, the “Special Virus” program begins on February 12th. Dr. Len Hayflick sets up a U.S. mycoplasma laboratory at Stanford University. Many believe the “Special Virus” program began in November 1961 with a Phizer contract.

Beginning in 1963 and for every year thereafter, the “Special Virus” program conducted annual progress reviews at Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA. The annual meetings are representative of the aggressive nature in which the United States pursued the development of AIDS.

In 1964, the United States Congress gave full support for the leukemia/lymphoma (AIDS) virus research.

In 1967, the National Academy of Sciences launched a full scale assault on Africa. The CIA (Technical Services Division) acknowledged its secret inoculator program.

In 1969, Fort Detrick told world scientists and the Pentagon asked for more money, they knew they could make AIDS. Nixon’s July 18 secret memo to Congress on “Overpopulation” serves as the start of the paper trail of the AIDS Holocaust.

In 1970, President Nixon signed PL91-213 and John D. Rockefeller, III became the “Population Czar.” Nixon’s August 10 National Security Memo leaves no doubt as to the genocidal nature of depopulation.

In 1971, Progress Report #8 is issued. The flowchart (pg. 61) will forever resolve the true laboratory birth origin of AIDS. Eventually the Special Virus program will issue 15 reports and over 20,000 scientific papers. The flowchart links every scientific paper, medical experiment and U.S. contract. The flowchart would remain “missing” until 1999. World scientists were stunned. The flowchart will gain in significance throughout the 21st Century. It is also clear the experiments conducted under Phase IV-A of the flowchart are our best route to better therapy and treatment for people living with HIV/AIDS. The first sixty pages of progress report #8 of the Special Virus program prove conclusively the specific goal of the program. By June 1977, the Special Virus program had produced 15, 000 gallons of AIDS. The AIDS virus was attached as complement to vaccines sent to Africa and Manhattan. However, because of the thoroughness of authors, like Dr. Robert E. Lee, we also learn the Stanford Mycoplasma Laboratory issues one of the first papers with AIDS in the title. “Viral Infections in Man Associated with Acquired Immunological Deficiency States.” The primary scientist, Dr. Thomas Merigan, was a “consultant” to the Special Virus program.

Progress Report # 8 at 104 - 106 proves Dr. Robert Gallo was secretly working on the development of AIDS with full support of the sector of the U.S. government that seeks to kill its citizens. Dr. Gallo can not explain why he excluded his role as a “project officer” for the Special Virus program from his biographical book. Dr. Gallo’s early work and discoveries will finally be viewed in relation to the flowchart. We now know where every experiment fits into the flowchart. The “research logic” is irrefutable evidence of a federal “Manhattan-style project” to develop a “contagious” cancer that “selectively” kills. Dr. Gallo’s 1971 paper is identical to his 1984 AIDS announcement.

Progress Report #8 at 273 - 286 proves we gave AIDS to monkeys. Since 1962, the United States and Dr. Robert Gallo have been inoculating monkeys and re-releasing them back into the wild. Thus, even government scientists are baffled that both HIV-1 and HIV-II would “suddenly emerge” from two distinct monkey ancestral relatives during the last 100 years. A 1999 Japanese study will ultimately prove the Man to Monkey origin of Monkey AIDS. The monkey experiments summary definitively proves Monkey AIDS is also man-made.

In 1972, the United States and the Soviet Union entered into a biological agreement that would signal the death knell for the Black Population. The 1972 agreement for collaboration and cooperation in the development of offensive biological agents is still U. S. policy.

In 1973, we find that world scientist, Garth Nicolson reports on his project, “Role of the Cell Surface in Escape From Immunological Surveillance.” His report is accompanied by seven published papers. Dr. Nicolson worked in conjunction with the Special Virus program from 1972 until 1978. Dr. Nicolson is considered by some to be Dr. Gallo’s “West Coast” counterpart. It is strongly held that because of Dr. Nicolson, Dr. Robert Gallo and Dr. Luc Montagnier would secretly meet in Southern California to coordinate what they would and would not say about the special virus development program.

In 1974, Furher Henry Kissinger releases his NSSM-200 (U.S. Plan to Address Overpopulation). It is the only issue of discussion at the World Population Conference in Bucharest, Romania.  The men in the shadows had won, the whole world agrees to secretly cull Africa’s population. Today it is Africa and other undesirables. Tomorrow it may be you.

In 1975, President Gerald Ford signs National Security Defense Memorandum #314. The United States implements the Kissinger NSSM-200.

In 1976, the United States issues Progress Report #13 of the Special Virus program. The report proves the United States had various international agreements with the Russians, Germans, British, French, Canadians and Japanese. The plot to kill Black people has wide international support. In March, the Special Virus began production of the AIDS virus, by June 1977, the program will have produced 15,000 gallons of AIDS. President Jimmy Carter allows for the continuation of the secret plan to cull the Black Population.

In 1977, Dr. Robert Gallo and the top Soviet Scientists meet to discuss the proliferation of the 15,000 gallons of AIDS. They attach AIDS as complement to the Small pox vaccine for Africa, and the “experimental” hepatitis B vaccine for Manhattan. According to authors June Goodfield and Alan Cantwell, it is Batch #751 that was administered in New York to thousands of innocent people. This government will never be able to repay the people for the social rape, humiliation and out right prejudice people with HIV/AIDS face on a daily basis. The men in the shadows of the AIDS curtain accurately calculated that you would not care if only Blacks and gays are dying. In fact you don’t care that nearly a half million Gulf War veterans are encumbered with something contagious. Soon there will be no more Black people and a confused military, older White people will start suddenly dying and you still won’t get it. Be here now for us, give us a chance to be there for you.

Suddenly, just as President Nixon had predicted, there was explosive death. On November 4, 1999, the U.S. White House announced,.... “Within a period as short as five years, all new infections of HIV in the United States will be African American....” At some point our experts must be allowed to begin the interface process of allowing the history of this virus program to count. It is ludicrous and preposterous to fail to review the U.S. virus program in which to elucidate the etiology of AIDS.

More of the history of the secret virus program can be found in the archives of Dr. John B. Moloney. A review of the files under Dr. Moloney’s name would further pinpoint additional dates and records consistent with one of the greatest hunts, capture and proliferation of disease in the history of the human race. We have found the missing link. It is the guts of the research logic of a federal program that seeks to kill. We have found a curtain of AIDS. We can identify some of the people who work in the shadows of the curtain. Dr. Robert Gallo and Dr. Garth Nicolson must lead us in review. In light of the attack mechanisms available in which to inhibit AIDS, it is time that not another person be stricken with this relic, synthetic mycoplasma chimera.

Help those of us who are still here to realize full and contributory lives. We are all one people.

On September 28, 1998 I filed suit against the United States for the “creation”, “production” and “proliferation” of AIDS. On November 7, 2000, the appeals court agreed with the lower court and held AIDS bioengineering as “frivolous.” The world continues to wait for the court to rule on the resubmitted issues. The court can not continue to simply brush aside our experts and the government’s flowchart.

I have been asked to give my perspective with regard to the federal program MK-NAOMI . MK-NAOMI is the code for the development of AIDS. The “MK” portion stands for the two co-authors of the AIDS virus, Robert Manaker and Paul Kotin. The “NAOMI” portion stands for “Negroes are Only Momentary Individuals.” The U.S. government continues to orchestrate silence from the very top echelons of the Congress and military. At present there is no accountability. The good people will ultimately create a tsunami of public outrage. We can not allow the state an autocratic right to govern outside of the Constitution. Our society is structured to hide crimes committed by the state, while punishing citizens for minor indiscretions. Their strategy focuses on the general confusion they can create via manipulation of the media. They are very good at what they do. We must become more focused in our continued presentation of the flowchart. The flowchart is the absolute missing link in proving the existence of a coordinated research program to develop a cancer virus that depletes the immune system. New diseases do not create old illnesses.

This compilation of court documents and correspondence is the true effort of one man’s achievement in solving the mystery of the origin of AIDS. We have found the origin of AIDS, it is us.

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

AIDS: A Doctor’s Note on the Man-Made Theory


When AIDS officially began in 1981 the public was told that anal sex, drugs, and homosexuality were at the root of the new "gay plague." The first cases were all young, predominantly white, and previously healthy homosexual men from Manhattan who were dying mysteriously from "gay pneumonia" and "gay cancer" in the form of Kaposi’s sarcoma. The association with homosexuality was so remarkable that the disease was initially termed GRID ("gay-related immune deficiency"). To this day, gays are still blamed for the spread of AIDS into the U.S. population.

When the disease first broke out, a new virus was suspected, but officials reassured "the general public" there was nothing to worry about. Of course, the health experts were wrong. Now most of the world’s AIDS cases are heterosexuals. The AIDS virus (HIV) can also be transmitted vaginally; and one does not need to be a drug abuser, a promiscuous person or a homosexual to contract AIDS.

The Green Monkey Theory

Where did HIV originate? Prominent cancer virologists and government epidemiologists have theorised that HIV originated in African green monkeys. Purportedly the monkey virus "jumped species" and entered the black population. From there it migrated to Haiti and Manhattan. After the virus entered the black heterosexual population in the late 1970s, it rapidly spread to millions of blacks because of transfusions with HIV-infected blood, dirty needles, promiscuity and genital ulcers — or so the experts said.

Not all scientists believe the official monkey story, although it is rare to find people who express this view publicly. One persistent underground rumor is that AIDS is biological warfare. Proponents of the AIDS conspiracy theory believe that AIDS has nothing to do with green monkeys, homosexuality, drug addiction, genital ulcerations, anal sex or promiscuity, but that it has to do with scientists experimenting on blacks and gays: in short, AIDS is genocide. Most African-Americans have heard the story that HIV is a manufactured virus genetically-engineered to kill off the black race. Thirty percent of New York City blacks polled by The New York Times (October 29, 1990) actually believe AIDS is an ethno-specific bioweapon designed in a laboratory to infect black people.

Despite the general acceptance that HIV came from monkeys and the rain forest, there is no scientific evidence to prove that HIV and AIDS originated in Africa. What is true is that the first AIDS cases were uncovered in the U.S. in 1979, around the same time that AIDS cases were discovered in Africa. In addition, no stored African tissue from the 1970s tests positive for HIV. And scientists have a hard time explaining how a black heterosexual epidemic centered in Africa could have quickly transformed itself into a white homosexual epidemic in Manhattan.

The Gay Hepatitis-B Vaccine Experiment

Conveniently lost in the history of AIDS is the gay Hepatitis-B vaccine experiment that immediately preceded the decimation of gay Americans. A "cohort" of over a thousand young gays was injected with the vaccine at the New York Blood Center in Manhattan during the period November 1978 to October 1979.1 Similar gay experiments were conducted in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Denver, St. Louis, and Chicago, beginning in 1980.2 The AIDS epidemic broke out shortly thereafter.

The experiment was run by Wolf Szmuness, a Polish Jew born in 1919. He was a young medical student in eastern Poland when the Nazis invaded the country in 1939. His entire family perished in the Holocaust. When Poland was partitioned, Szmuness was taken prisoner and sent to Siberia.

After the war, he was allowed to finish medical school in Tomsk in central Russia. He married a Russian woman, had a daughter, and in 1959 was allowed to return to Poland where he became an expert in hepatitis.

According to June Goodfield’s account of his life in Quest for the Killers, Szmuness defected from Poland with his family in 1969, arriving penniless in New York with $15 in his pocket.3 Through scientific connections he found work as a laboratory technician at the New York Blood Center. Within a few years he was given his own lab at the center and was also appointed Professor of Public Health at Columbia University. By the mid-1970s, Szmuness was a world authority on hepatitis, and was invited back to Moscow in 1975 to give a scientific presentation. As a defector he was terrified to set foot back in the Soviet Union, but his colleagues assured him he would have the full protection of the U.S. State Department. His return to Russia was a scientific triumph.

In the late 1970s, Wolf Szmuness was awarded millions of dollars to undertake the most important mission of his life: the Hepatitis-B vaccine experiment. Szmuness specifically wanted to use gay men to avoid "serious legal and logistical problems."4 For his study he did not want monogamous men, nor men with lovers. He chose only healthy, young, responsible, intelligent, and primarily white homosexuals. The experiment was costly and he didn’t want any uncooperative or hard-to-find gays messing up his experiment. Involved in the experiment were the Centers for Disease Control, the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Abbott Laboratories, and Merck, Sharp & Dohme. Szmuness’ experiment was hugely successful, and his vaccine was hailed as having tremendous global implications.

The Gay Plague

The links of the gay experiment to the outbreak of AIDS are obvious to anyone who wants to see the connection. Three months after the experiment began, the first cases of AIDS reported to the CDC appeared in young gay men in Manhattan in 1979. The first San Francisco AIDS case appeared in that city in September 1980, six months after the Hepatitis-B experiment started there.5 In June 1981 the AIDS epidemic became "official."

Were gay men given experimental vaccines contaminated with the AIDS virus? The government says no, but government agencies have a long history of covert and unethical medical experimentation, particularly with minorities. Was it simply a quirk of nature that a virus "out of Africa" would suddenly decimate the most hated minority in America?

Why did the U.S. government choose Wolf Szmuness, a Soviet-trained doctor and a recent American immigrant to head this dangerous experiment? Goodfield, who has written the definitive account of the Hepatitis-B experiment, claims Szmuness has a painful life. Confined as a political prisoner in Siberia during World War II, he was repeatedly interrogated and beaten by the Russian KGB for refusing to cooperate in spy activities. When he could not be broken, they warned him: "Say nothing of this to anyone, but remember. We will reach you anywhere in the world. No matter where you go, no matter where you try to hide, you will never be out of our grasp."6

The experimental Hepatitis-B vaccine was primarily manufactured by Merck. However, during the experiment Szmuness was concerned about possible vaccine contamination. Goodfield writes, "This was no theoretical fear, contamination having been suspected in one vaccine batch made by the National Institutes of Health, though never in Merck’s."7

After the Hepatitis-B experiment ended, Szmuness insisted that all thirteen thousand blood specimens donated by gay men be retained at the Blood Center for future use. Due to space requirements, it is highly unusual for any laboratory to retain so many old blood specimens. However, several years later when this blood was retested for the presence of HIV antibodies, government epidemiologists were able to detect the "introduction" and the spread of HIV into the gay community.

When asked why he was keeping so many vials of blood, Szmuness replied, "Because one day another disease may erupt and we’ll need this material."8 A few months after the Hepatitis-B experiment began at the Center, the first AIDS cases began to appear in gay men living in Manhattan. And the retesting of gay blood at the Blood Center proved that HIV was first introduced into the gay population of New York City sometime around 1978-1979, the same year Szmuness’ gay Hepatitis-B experiment began.9

Was Szmuness psychic in his prediction that a new disease would appear in the gay community? Or did he actually know or suspect that a new, deadly virus was being introduced into the gay volunteers? Unfortunately, the answers to these questions can only be surmised. In June 1982 Szmuness died of lung cancer. In his eulogy, Aaron Kellner of the Blood Center wrote: "It is the rare physician who, like Wolf Szmuness, is given the grace to touch the lives of billions of people; those living on this planet and generations yet unborn."10

The African Origin of AIDS

Was HIV introduced into millions of Africans in the late 1970s during the smallpox vaccine eradication programs sponsored by the World Health Organisation? It is known that animal and human cells harbor all sorts of viruses, including viruses not yet discovered, and animal tissue cell cultures are often used in the manufacture of viral vaccines. Therefore, the possibility of vaccine contamination with an animal virus is a constant danger in the manufacture of vaccines.

Despite the most meticulous precautions in production, contaminating animal viruses are known to survive the vaccine process. For example, during the 1950s, millions of people were injected with polio vaccines contaminated with "SV-40", a cancer-causing green monkey virus. Such vaccine contamination problems are largely kept hidden from the public. Yet in spite of the known danger, drug companies and physicians always pooh-pooh any suggestion that AIDS could have arisen from animal virus-contaminated vaccines. Animal cancer viruses are also contained in fetal calf serum, a serum commonly used as a laboratory nutrient to feed animal and human tissue cell cultures. Viruses in calf serum can be carried over as contaminants into the final vaccine product.

The problem of vaccine contamination by fetal calf serum and its relationship to AIDS is the subject of a letter by J. Grote ("Bovine visna virus and the origin of the AIDS epidemic") published in the Journal of the Royal (London) Society of Medicine in October 1988. Grote discounts the green monkey theory and questions whether bovine visna contamination of laboratory-used fetal bovine serum could cause AIDS. Bovine visna virus is similar in appearance to HIV. Grote, a London-based AIDS researcher, writes:

The seriousness of this becomes apparent when we consider the manufacture of vaccines requires the growth of virus in cell cultures using fetal calf serum in the growth medium. The contamination of vaccines with adventitious viruses has been of concern for many years and the presence of virus-like structures in ‘virus-screened’ bovine serum has been reported. It seems absolutely vital that all vaccines are screened for HIV prior to use and that bovine visna virus is further investigated as to its relationship to HIV and its possible causal role in progression towards AIDS.

Millions of African blacks are reportedly infected with HIV. This large number could never have been infected by the simple act of a monkey virus "jumping" over to infect one African in the late 1970s. If that were the case, why don’t we now have millions of AIDS cases in the U.S.? One logical explanation for the millions of Africans infected is that the vaccines used in the World Health Organisation’s mass inoculation programs were contaminated. Was the contamination accidental or deliberate? It is well-known in vaccine circles that the vaccinia (cowpox) virus used in the manufacture of the smallpox vaccine works well in genetic engineering. Charles Pillar and Keith Yamamoto, authors of Gene Wars: Military Control Over the New Genetic Technology, state: "Researchers have been able to splice genes coding for the surface coats of other viruses, such as influenza, hepatitis, and rabies into vaccinia virus DNA. The result: a ‘broad spectrum’ vaccine with a coat of many colors."11

In 1985, the Russians caused an international furore by claiming that AIDS was caused by experiments carried out in the USA as part of the development of new biological weapons. Responding to this Soviet accusation, Pillar and Yamamoto admit that "although no evidence has been presented to support this claim, manipulating genes to defeat the body’s immune system is quite feasible."12

In Magic Shots, Allan Chase claims that during the years 1966-1977, the WHO utilised "200,000 people in forty countries — most of them nondoctors trained by seven hundred doctors and health professionals from over seventy participating countries — spent $300 million, and used forty million bifurcated vaccinating needles to administer 24,000 million (2.4 billion) doses of smallpox vaccine."13

On May 11, 1987, The London Times, one of the world’s most respected newspapers, published a front-page story entitled "Smallpox vaccine triggered AIDS virus." The story suggests that African AIDS is a direct outgrowth of the WHO smallpox eradication program. The smallpox vaccine allegedly awakened a "dormant" AIDS virus infection in the black population. Robert Gallo, the co-discoverer of HIV, was quoted as saying, "The link between the WHO program and the epidemic is an interesting and important hypothesis. I cannot say that it actually happened, but I have been saying for some years that the use of live vaccines such as that used for smallpox can activate a dormant infection such as HIV (the AIDS virus)." The Times story is one of the most important stories ever printed on the AIDS epidemic; yet the story was killed and never appeared in any major U.S. newspaper or magazine.

Despite covert human experimentation, vaccine contamination problems, and the genetic engineering of new and highly dangerous viruses, the medical establishment ignores the AIDS bio-warfare issue. For example, in the prestigious British Medical Journal (May 13, 1989), Myra McClure and Thomas Schultz wrote a paper on the "Origin of HIV" and quickly disposed of the idea that AIDS is connected to germ warfare. They simply state: "Lack of supporting evidence precludes serious discussion of such a bizarre hypothesis. This review deals with the theories on the origin of HIV that are scientifically plausible."

Thus, medical science ignores evidence suggesting AIDS originated as a secret experiment. Most physicians and microbiologists steadfastly hold on to the illogical and improbable green monkey theory of AIDS. And the major media remain silent, often dismissing the bio-warfare theory as communist propaganda of the most malicious sort. Forgotten is the connection between the National Academy of Sciences and the military bio-warfare establishment in the development of biological weapons for mass killings.

Creation of a Super Germ

A decade before the first cases of AIDS, Dr. Donald M. MacArthur, a spokesman for the U.S. Department of Defense, told a Congressional Hearing that a "super germ" could be developed as part of our experimental bio-warfare program. This genetically engineered germ would be very different from any previous microbe known to mankind. The agent would be a highly effective killing agent because the immune system would be powerless against this super-microbe (Testimony before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, Department of Defense Appropriations for 1970, dated July 1, 1969). A transcript of this meeting on "Synthetic Biological Agents" records the following comments of Dr. MacArthur:

1. All biological agents up to the present time are representatives of naturally occurring disease, and thus are known by scientists throughout the world. They are easily available to qualified scientists for research, either for offensive or defensive purposes.

2. Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.

3. A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10 million.

4. It would be very difficult to establish such a program. Molecular biology is a relatively new science. There are not many competent scientists in the field, almost all are in university laboratories, and they are generally adequately supported from sources other than the Department of Defense. However, it was considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National Academy of Sciences — National Research Council (NAS-NRC). The matter was discussed with the NAS-NRC, and tentative plans were made to initiate the program. However, decreasing funds in CB (chemical/biological) research, growing criticism of the CB program, and our reluctance to involve the NAS-NRC in such a controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the past two years. It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such research should not be undertaken lest it lead to yet another method of massive killing of large populations... Should an enemy develop it, there is little doubt that it is an important area of potential military technological inferiority in which there is no adequate research program.

Was the AIDS virus, or other so-called "emerging viruses" such as Ebola and Marburg viruses, created in bio-warfare laboratories during the 1970s? During the 1970s, the U.S. Army’s bio-warfare program intensified, particularly in the area of DNA and gene splicing research. Renouncing germ warfare except for "medical defensive research," President Richard Nixon in 1971 ordered that a major part of the Army’s bio-warfare research be transferred over to the National Cancer Institute (where HIV would be discovered a decade later by Gallo). That same year, Nixon also initiated his famous War on Cancer, and offensive bio-warfare research (particularly genetic engineering of viruses) continued under the umbrella of orthodox cancer research. Cancer virologists learned "to jump" animal cancer viruses from one species of animal to another. Chicken viruses were put into lamb kidney cells; baboon viruses were spliced into human cancer cells; the combinations were endless. In due process, deadly man-made viruses were developed, and new forms of cancer, immunodeficiency, and opportunistic infections were produced when these viruses were forced or adapted into laboratory animals and into human tissue cell cultures.14

As predicted by the bio-warfare experts, new cancer-causing monster viruses were created that had a deadly effect on the immune system. In one government-sponsored experiment reported in 1974, newborn chimpanzees were taken away from their mothers at birth and weaned on milk obtained from virus-infected cows. Some of the chimps sickened and died with two new diseases that had never been observed in chimps. The first was a parasitic pneumonia known as Pneumocystis Carinii pneumonia (later known as AIDS); the second was leukemia.15

Monkey Business

Almost two decades after the first U.S. AIDS cases were diagnosed, most people still believe the government’s green monkey story; and AIDS educators teach that HIV originated in Africa. However, a few cracks in the monkey theory have appeared in print.

A story entitled "Research refutes idea that human AIDS virus originated in monkey," appeared in the Los Angeles Times (June 2, 1988). In the process of decoding the genetic structure of the monkey virus and the human AIDS virus, Japanese molecular biologists discovered that the gene sequences of the two viruses differed by more than 50% — indicating absolutely no genetic relationship between the green monkey virus and HIV. The Japanese investigators specifically criticised Myron Essex and Phyllis Kanki of Harvard Medical School, who "discovered" a second AIDS virus in African green monkeys that was widely heralded in the media. Essex and Kanki’s "second" AIDS virus was later proven to be a contaminant monkey virus traced back to the Harvard researchers own laboratory.

More than a decade earlier, in 1975, Gallo reported the "discovery" of a "new" and "human" HL-23 virus he cultured from human leukemia cells. Eventually the virus was proven to be three contaminating ape viruses (gibbon-ape virus, simian sarcoma virus, and baboon endogenous virus). Gallo claims he has no idea how these animal viruses contaminated his research.16

If HIV is not related to a green monkey virus, what is its origin? On November 13, 1988, The Orange County Register devoted an entire section of the newspaper to AIDS in Africa. Several African officials were interviewed; all were adamant that AIDS did not originate in Africa. The theory "is false and has never been scientifically proved, so why should Africa be the scapegoat?" declared Dr. Didace Nzaramba, director of the AIDS prevention program in Rwanda. The Register commented:

From early on, scientists have speculated that the disease might have begun in Africa. Researchers in Africa tested old blood samples and said they found HIV-infected serum that went back years. In 1985, Harvard researchers, Phyllis Kanki and Myron Essex, announced the discovery of a new virus isolated in green monkeys that seemed similar to HIV. Eventually, researchers concluded that early blood tests used in Africa were not reliable, and Kanki and Essex said their blood tests probably had been contaminated and that their results were invalid. But the perception of an African link was established.

Media Disinformation

With the publication of And The Band Played On in 1987, the media became obsessed with author Randy Shilts’ "Patient Zero" story. In the popular, award-winning book, a young Canadian airline steward named Gaeton Dugas is portrayed as the promiscuous gay man "who brought the AIDS virus from Paris and ignited the epidemic in North America." Shilts, who later died of AIDS, never explained where or how Dugas got his infection.

After a year of swollen lymph nodes and a rash, Dugas was finally diagnosed with AIDS-associated "gay cancer" in June 1980 in New York City. What Shilts probably did not know is that when Dugas was diagnosed in 1980, over twenty percent of the Manhattan gays in the Hepatitis-B experiment were HIV-positive. This 20% infection rate was discovered after the HIV blood test became available in 1985, and after the stored blood at the New York Blood Center was retested for HIV antibodies (JAMA, Vol. 255, pp. 2167-2172, 1986). Remarkably, these gay men had the highest recorded incidence of HIV anywhere in the world for that time! Even in African populations, where AIDS has been theorised to exist for decades, or even millennia, there were never reports of such a high incidence of HIV in 1980.

Shilts’ sensational Patient Zero story quickly became "fact." Even the AMA-sponsored American Medical News (October 23, 1987) fell for the ludicrous story, claiming that Dugas "may have brought AIDS to the United States." The media continue to promote unlikely stories about the origin of AIDS, always avoiding discussion of the idea that HIV came out of a laboratory, and always pointing the finger to black Africa.

In late 1987, the media widely reported an "old AIDS case" dating back to 1968. DNA testing of the blood and tissue was reported as HIV-positive.17 For the last year of his life, "Robert", a 15-year-old black boy from St. Louis, wasted away with a bizarre disease that severely bloated his legs and genitalia. His sexual preference was unknown, but his doctors tried hard to insinuate the dying boy was gay. At autopsy, internal Kaposi’s sarcoma of the rectum was discovered, along with anal warts and lacerations. And after fingering the dead boy’s rectum, the pathologist noted "a lax anal sphincter." When newer viral identification techniques were reapplied to Robert’s blood in 1990, his blood retested HIV-negative, proving that Robert never had AIDS.18

In 1990 the media sensationalised another "old AIDS case," this time an unmarried English sailor who died in Manchester in 1959. When his stored tissue remains tested positive for HIV, major newspapers throughout the world used this case to again discredit the persistent rumor that AIDS was a man-made disease. The New York Times (July 24) declared:

The case also refutes the widely publicised charges made by Soviet officials several years ago that AIDS arose from a virus that had escaped from a laboratory experiment that went awry or was a biological warfare agent. The human retrovirus group to which the AIDS virus belongs was unknown at the time. Nor did scientists then have the genetic engineering techniques needed to create a new virus.

In a letter to the medical journal Lancet in January 1996, this 1959 case was ruled not to be AIDS because the DNA tests were found to be contaminated due to a laboratory error.

Despite the denial of the Times regarding the laboratory creation of new AIDS-like viruses, it was common practice during the early 1970s for virologists to alter animal viruses by inserting them into other animal species and into human tissue cells in culture. Experiments performed at Harvard in the mid-1970s by Max Essex and Donald Francis (two of the best-known AIDS experts) produced AIDS in cats with the feline leukemia retrovirus. In addition, a decade before the outbreak of AIDS in the U.S., Robert Gallo was engineering cancer-causing retroviruses and studying the effects of viral mutants and their ability to suppress the immune system. A full description of Gallo’s animal retrovirus research activities dating back to 1967 is chronicled in Emerging Viruses, AIDS and Ebola: Nature, Accident or Genocide? by Dr. Leonard Horowitz.19

Secret and Covert
Biological Warfare Research

It is difficult, if not impossible, to determine the truth about global biological warfare capabilities and their possible effects on world health. The American taxpayer is kept ignorant about U.S. chemical and bio-warfare programs. Scientists involved in bio-warfare research are sworn to secrecy and silence. Thus, "classified" and "top secret" medical experimentation continues to be promoted by powerful government agencies, such as the CIA, the CDC, the Department of Defense, the military, and other institutions.

Recent revelations of horrific radiation experiments conducted on unsuspecting U.S. citizens during the Cold War years up until the 1980s have shocked the nation. Some of this research was conducted at the most prestigious medical institutions in our country. None of the perpetrators have been brought to trial. In light of these revelations, it is inconceivable to think that leading AIDS scientists would be unaware of the connections between their institutional research and the bio-warfare establishment.

Currently, strange and unprecedented diseases are mysteriously appearing in various parts of the world. The peculiar Persian Gulf War Syndrome has sickened over 50,000 of our vets who served in Desert Shield/Storm. Their illnesses have been largely dismissed by health experts as due to "psychological stress," even though there is evidence that this new disease is contagious and sexually-transmitted. Nevertheless, government health officials remain silent on these issues.

A few scientists insist that some cases of Gulf War Syndrome are related to biological warfare agents. Dr. Garth Nicholson and his wife Nancy, formerly scientists at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, have discovered in the blood of some sick reservists a new infectious microbe (a mycoplasma) that has part of the AIDS virus spliced into its genetic material! The Nicholsons say: "The type of mycoplasma we identified was highly unusual and it almost certainly didn’t occur naturally. It has one gene from the HIV-1 virus — but only one gene. This meant it was almost certainly an artificially modified microbe — altered purposefully by scientists." (National Enquirer, April 2, 1996).

By censoring certain aspects of AIDS history, particularly the origin of HIV, we allow dangerous medical experimentation to continue. The New York Blood Center is now testing a new vaccine made from a "harmless" canary-pox virus that has been genetically engineered to carry parts of HIV, the AIDS virus. The Center is recruiting HIV-negative gay men by funding Project Achieve, an organisation designed to test and sign-up young men for the new vaccine experiment. Homosexual men are lured into the program by posters that feature cute, multi-ethnic gay boys. According to Timothy Murphy of HX magazine, there is a waiting list for the Center’s vaccine experiment. Gay men are urged to sign-up with Project Achieve at (212) 388-0008.

The enigmatic Dr. Szmuness has been erased from AIDS chronicles. His name does not appear in Shilts’ Band, nor in Mirko Grmek’s History of AIDS (1990), or in Laurie Garret’s massive tome on emerging viruses, The Coming Plague (1994). Although his untimely death went largely unnoticed in medical journals, he was remembered and honored on May 11, 1984, by a small coterie of medical power brokers and distinguished scientists who convened at a landmark symposium in the U.S. capitol. The meeting entitled "Infection, Immunity, and Blood Transfusion" was sponsored by the American Red Cross.20

Paying tribute to Szmuness were top government scientists in AIDS and cancer research, the most well-known researchers in animal experimentation, the heads of the most prestigious biomedical establishments in the country, and the chief executives of drug companies tied to genetic engineering, vaccine production, and biological warfare research. Dr. Robert Gallo, who had announced the discovery of the AIDS virus to the American public three weeks earlier, was one of the most distinguished attendees.

There is an ominous link between cancer and AIDS, between animal experimentation and the genetic engineering of viruses, between biological warfare technology and drug companies, between gay experiments and AIDS, between vaccine programs and the contamination of the nation’s blood supply. Why else would all these people from diverse areas of science be attending this high level government conference?

There is also a connection between Szmuness’ gay experiment and the outbreak of AIDS that cannot be denied. This connection is not coincidental or a paranoid fantasy. It is time for a serious study of the link between covert biological warfare research and the initial outbreak of the "gay AIDS plague." Ignoring evidence pointing to AIDS as a man-made disease makes a sham out of AIDS education.


1. Szmuness W, Stevens C, Harley E, et al: Hepatitis-B vaccine; Demonstration of efficacy in a controlled clinical trial in a high-risk population in the United States. New England J Med 303: 833-841, 1980.

2. Francis D, Hadler S, Thompson S, The prevention of Hepatitis-B with vaccine. Report of the Centers for Disease Control multi-center efficacy trial among homosexual men. Annals Int Med 97: 362-366, 1982.

3. Goodfield J: Vaccine on trial. Goodfield J. Quest for the Killers. Birkhauser, Boston, 1985, p. 51-97.

4. Szmuness W: Large scale efficacy trials of Hepatitis-B vaccines in the USA; Baseline data and protocols. J Med Virology 4: 327-340, 1979.

5. Cantwell, A: The Hepatitis-B vaccine trials (1978-1981). In AIDS & The Doctors of Death. Aries Rising Press, Los Angeles, CA, 1988, pp. 65-80.

6. Goodfield, Quest for the Killers, p. 57

7. Ibid, p. 86

8. Ibid, p. 92

9. Stevens CE, Taylor PE, Zang EA, et al: Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type III infection in a cohort of homosexual men in New York City. JAMA 255: 2167-2172, 1986.

10. Kellner A: Reflections of Wolf Szmuness in, Progress in Clinical and Biological Research 182: 3-10, 1985.

11. Piller C and Yamamoto K: Gene Wars: Military Control over the New Genetic Technologies. Beech Tree Books/William Morrow, New York, 1988, p. 103

12. Ibid, p. 97

13. Chase A: Magic Shots. William Morrow and Company, New York, 1982, pp. 81-82.

14. Cantwell: Biowarfare. In Queer Blood. Aries Rising Press, Los Angeles, 1993, pp. 31-40.

15. McClure HM, Keeling ME, Custer RP, et al: Erythroleukemia in two infant chimpanzees fed milk from cows naturally infected with the bovine C-type virus. Cancer Research 34: 2745-2757, 1974.

16. Connor S: AIDS science stands on trial. New Scientist, February 12, 1987, pp. 49-58.

17. Garry RF, Witte MH, Gottleib AA, et al: Documentation of an AIDS virus infection in the United States in 1968. JAMA 260: 2085-2087, 1988.

18. Cantwell: AIDS: New or old? In Queer Blood. Aries Rising Press, Los Angeles, 1993, pp. 61-69.

19. Horowitz LG.: Emerging Viruses, AIDS & Ebola: Nature, Accident or Genocide? Tetrahedron, Inc, Rockport, MA, 1996.

20. Dodd RY, Barker LF (Eds): Infection, Immunity and Blood Transfusion. Prcdngs of the XVIth Annual Scientific Symposium of the American Red Cross, Wa. DC. Alan R Liss, Inc, NY 1985, pp. xiii-xv.

Dr. Alan Cantwell is a physician and AIDS and cancer researcher. He is the author of AIDS & the Doctors of Death and Queer Blood, published by Aries Rising Press. He can be reached at PO Box 29532, Los Angeles, CA 90029, USA. Phone/Fax +1 213-462-6458, Email: This article originally appeared in Paranoia magazine. 46a.htm

AIDS: Made in America part 10

Brian Mahy
Money Goes Missing, but Brian Stays Put

First, as we embark upon this study of Dr. Brian Mahy formerly the Director of the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, Georgia, we want to pose a ‘Hypothetical Situation’ for our readers and to ask them to respond. Here is the situation:
The eighteen year old boy in the mail room of a large office is also in charge of collecting money from all staff members for the coffee fund. He collects the money once a week and on Saturday morning he goes to the mall and buys coffee, filters, cream, sugar and diet sweetener, which he takes back to the office lounge and stores appropriately, to be available for Monday morning.
One Monday morning he tells certain members of the staff that he had not bought any decaffeinated coffee on Saturday because he did not have enough money. The office manager calls him aside and learns that on Friday the boy had collected $90 from staff members. He also learns that on Saturday he had bought and paid for $40 worth of supplies, and has receipts for these. He also has receipts showing that he had paid for a movie ticket, a bag of popcorn and a large soft drink. Total:$10. The boy is short $40 of what he had collected for the coffee fund, and he can not account for the shortage.
So there is a hypothetical situation, now we want you to suggest what should be done about the $30 shortfall, and what should happen to the mail room coffee break eighteen year old.
Once you have carefully thought it over, forget about it as having been just an idle diversion from this study of AIDS and CFS. Instead, let’s get serious. Try this one:
Dr. Brian Mahy, the Director of the viral diseases division of the Centers for Disease Control, had been given, during his tenure, somewhere around $24 million by vote of Congress to investigate chronic fatigue syndrome. Many members Congress may personally have been inclined to dismiss the disease because they had read such trivial junk as Dr. Edward Shorter’s From Paralysis to Fatigue but they also held elected office and the growing numbers of CFS victims made it prudent to go along with the appropriation of research money.
Thus, into the hands of Director Mahy there was delivered $24 million of U.S. Taxpayers’ money. And Brian made a big thing about how the money was being spent to make great progress in the search for CFS disease answers. However, like Kurt Vonnegut’s space men in Breakfast of Champions who communicated by farting and tap dancing, Mahy never managed to give a clear picture of how his expensive research was progressing.
Then one day Dr. William Reeves, who was also a researcher at CDC and whose department was supposed to be getting some of that $24 million, called a press conference under the protection of the Whistle Blowers’ Act. At the press conference Dr. Reeves alleged that his boss, Dr. Mahy was misspending the money voted by Congress.
Congress had no choice but to act. They temporarily relieved Mahy of his title, but kept him on payroll. Then, they asked for an audit of where the $24 million had gone.
The auditor’s report was damning. It seems that Mahy had spent about $12 million on what might be termed CFS research if, that is, one were to interpret ‘CFS research’ in the most liberal way. Then, said the auditor, Mahy had clearly misspent $8 million on things that in no way could be called CFS research. Finally came the ‘coffee fund’ clinker (see ‘Hypothetical Situation’ above). The auditor reported that, try as hard as he could, Dr. Brian Mahy was not able to remember where the remaining $4 million had gone.
This, of course, was very serious stuff and Congress took appropriate action. First, they appointed a new Director. Then, to punish Mahy for the loss of $4 million, they moved him to a smaller office down the hall from his previous large director’s office. There, to our current knowledge, he still sits. Doing what, we are not sure. We tried to phone him to ask, but the telephone receptionist at CDC to whom we spoke told us that we would have to speak to CDC’s public relations people. Dr. Mahy, she told us, was not being forwarded any phone calls.
After we had posed our ‘Hypothetical Situation’ above and had asked what you would do about the boy and the forty missing dollars, we said ‘forget it”. We take that back. What would you do? Chances are that a number of you would say, “Fire the coffee boy”.
Now to the crux of this whole affair: Why was Mahy not fired and even criminally charged for the loss of $4 million?
Answer: Dr. Brian Mahy knew too much about the development of the AIDS/ CFS disease pathogens to be fired. Furthermore, Congress has been given their marching orders by those who give such orders from the shadows: “Do not press the Mahy loss of $4 million. Period.”
And that is where it sits.
Before we leave this aspect of the Brian Mahy story, we must make one passing reference to the media assets who cover up the truth about AIDS and CFS.
When Mahy was revealed to have lost $4 million, Science Magazine suggested two possible explanations. First, they suggested, Mahy is a scientist and not an accountant. Maybe he had just got mixed up when he did his bookkeeping. Or, said Science perhaps Mahy, being a scientist, knew better where to spend the money from Congress than did the Congressmen who had voted it to him.
Science is, by and large, a magazine devoted to reporting news about science. However, at some level of its administration there is a knowledge and acceptance of certain subjects that must be kept from their readers. Such subjects include, and indeed especially include, any reference to the truth about AIDS and CFS. If time permitted we could provide careful analysis of articles and editorial comment by them that clearly demonstrates their complicity in covering up this crime beyond belief. That, however, must wait for our book to be published on May 19, 2005.
What Does Mahy Know, and When Did He Know It?
There are different places in the human body where organs or other sites function as defenders of that body. As we have noted in our chapter on Huebner (above) one of the first sites of defence are the adenoids and the tonsils. These clusters of lymphoid tissue sample air heading for the lungs and food heading for the stomach. If the adenoids pick up air-borne mycoplasmas they can react by degenerating spontaneously.
But, there is another important line of defence, and that is to be found in each individual cell of the body: that is cell-mediated immunity. This line of defence in the human immune system looms awfully large when one reads certain literature such as the Progress Reports of the Special Virus [Leukemia/ Lymphoma] [Cancer] Programs. For example, in P.R. #9, on page 39, the researchers report that they had been busy studying ‘ host immunocompetence’, and how that competence might be compromised. When the cell loses its ability to intercept pathogens, a major part of the defence system is lost. If this happens, then retroviruses, which normally can not access a cell, are able to do so and once inside they are able to do their damage.
So, one must first destroy the cell’s defence if one is to get a retrovirus such as that of sheep visna, into the targeted-cell where the latter’s own DNA is taken over by the RNA of the invader. One must access the reticuloendothelial system comprising all the phagocytic cells and put them out of action. Phagocytic cells in turn are those cells, which sweep through the body consuming foreign and hence potentially hurtful invaders. If these cells are compromised, the cell’s defence is compromised.
Enter, stage right, Brian Mahy a way back in the early 1960’s where he is found to be studying an unusual virus called ‘lactic dehydrogenase elevating virus’ [LDEV] and its association with leukemia. Keep in mind that the whole focus at the start was the ‘leukemia/ lymphoma’ consequences of immune system compromise, as triggered by the mycoplasma. In 1954 D. G. Edward had built upon the work of Huebner with a study titled “The pleuro-pneumonia group of organisms: a review together with new observations.” The PPLO is the mycoplasma, and Mahy was attempting to understand the process by which cellular defence is destroyed by LDEV effects upon the reticuloendothelial system.
Taken in isolation, such research could appear innocent enough. However, fitting in as it does with the related research going on at the time under the SVLP and with the related scientists such as Guy de The [Ultrastructure of the lactic dehydrogenase virus and cell-virus relationships] and J. B. Moloney [The rodent Leukemia’s: Virus-induced murine Leukemia’s] and considering the fact that Mahy was recruited into the CDC and rose to be a major officer therein, all hints of innocence evaporate. (Moloney, by the way, was a friend of Robert Gallo, [see Article Nine above] Of their relationship Gallo has this to say:
“Although my lab was then part of the Cancer Treatment Division of the National Cancer Institute, John Moloney, who was then running the Virus Cancer Program in the Division of Cancer Cause and Prevention, passed funds from his program to our laboratory, hoping our work might help his.”
In other words, Moloney and Gallo were conspiring to have money voted to one area, actually go to another area. This is called ‘conversion’, in the legal sense of unauthorized use of property belonging to another. It was only one part of the financial sleight of hand that was designed to make it difficult if not impossible to trace what was going on.
Another important part of this financial trickery lay in the fact that President Nixon was to be the sole approving signatory for money handed out under SVCP, and it was to Nixon alone that Moloney was responsible.
The adage ‘follow the money’ was, therefore, very difficult to do in practice and it showed in the way Mahy handled the money entrusted to him.
Why would Mahy not use the money voted by Congress for the purpose of researching CFS for that purpose? The answer is clear: as a part of the vast conspiracy that brought the SVLP/ SVCP program into being with its twin pathogens as the product of millions of dollars expended, Mahy already knew what caused CFS and by extension, he knew full well where and how AIDS came to invade the human family.
There was a great danger for Mahy if he actually paid out this money to genuine and moral researchers. They might well discover and report the truth: AIDS and CFS were developed in United States Government and Government-controlled private laboratories and were deployed by the Centers for Disease Control.
And that is why Mahy still works for the CDC. He knows too much to be fired.
We are greatly indebted to author/ researcher, Robert E. Lee for the information on Brian Mahy’s early work.

AIDS: Made in America part 9

Robert Gallo
‘Thanks, Luc”

Robert Gallo is an unprincipled, immoral gangster and is the scientific front man for the Rockefeller eugenics agenda. His attempt to claim Luc Montagnier’s LAV as his own discovery under the name HTLV-lll is well known. His experiments upon children aged as young as two years [and to whom he referred as ‘informed volunteers’] are on the record and are developed in great detail in our work-in-progress The Crime Beyond Belief. In our article on Hilary Koprowski we have already noted Gallo’s ‘father/ son’ relationship with the former. Less well known, is Gallo’s ‘friendship’ with Dr. Carleton Gajdusek.
When Gajdusek was arrested for sexually molesting one of his adopted ‘sons’, it was Gallo who put up the bail money. We shall say more about Gajdusek later in the article, but at this point we want to make it clear that Gallo has critical links with all the main players in this tragic story of AIDS.
When the eugenics evil came to dominate the minds and social goals of the Rockefellers and they in turn used their inherited wealth [much of it criminally acquired by the family patriarch John D. Rockefeller, Sr.] to buy the media and the politicians, they needed someone in science, who had one foot in the public sector camp of government health agencies, and another foot in the camp of the private capital pharmaceutical industry who would convert the science of the Koprowski Krowd into the vaccines of the WHO smallpox campaign.
In Robert Gallo they had their man. Let’s outline the rogue’s progress as he helps convert the lunacy of eugenics into the crime beyond belief… AIDS and its mirror image…CFS.
In Gallo’s self-serving account of his career, Virus Hunting, some of what he writes is apparently true. Let’s start with one of those truths quoted from page 20:
“In Providence College I majored in biology, helped in a research project on cholesterol biosynthesis… and became interested in the thymus gland… As a strange coincidence, the focus of my research team twenty years later would be on the thymus-derived T -cells.”
Wow! A strange co-incidence, indeed.
To the average reader of this Special Edition on AIDS, this quote of 42 words appears to be making note of one or two simple facts of Gallo’s career. However, when one has spent the last nine years as we have trying to plumb the murky depths of AIDS and CFS, these 42 words are like a sample of the rot in the channel’s bottom mud. Let us explain.
When Robert Huebner found the mycoplasma in the spontaneously degenerating adenoids of some Naval recruits, [see article on Huebner above] he realized that the mycoplasma was apparently capable of doing great damage to living tissue. But he didn’t know how it all worked.
The science of how certain species of mycoplasma acted was explored by other scientists, and in the work of three of the latter, we find our first intriguing detail linking AIDS to Robert Gallo in Providence College. The three scientists, S. Rottem, E. A. Pfendt, and L. Hayflick, released the results of their research in 1970 in an article titled “Sterol Requirements of T-Strain Mycoplasmas”. The researchers demonstrated that the T-strain mycoplasmas had an absolute growth requirement for the up-take of pre-formed sterols from host cells. Such sterols included cholesterol.
Cholesterol! Take another look at what Gallo was doing when he w as a student at Providence College: “…a research project on the biosynthesis of cholesterol.” He was off to an early start. The question is: was it just a co-incidence (as he labels it) that one of the critical factors in mycoplasmal-instigated diseases happened to be the subject of early Gallo study? Or, was Gallo being prepared very early on to work in a field, which required knowledge of cholesterol biosynthesis?
Your guess is as good as ours, but we believe that there is a very strong possibility that Gallo had been identified early on for work in the ‘relevance of this field of [molecular biology] to biological warfare’ as Dr. MacArthur was later to suggest to the Congressmen (June 9, 1969) and that in ‘the mid-1950s’ Gallo was being prepared while still a college student for a future role in that warfare. We do not have the space to develop this theme here, but in our forthcoming book we look at the recruitment of college students for future service in lieu of being drafted for military service, and use the story of people like Philip Agee, Carleton Gajdusek and Edward Shorter to demonstrate our thesis.
Gallo himself acknowledges the appeal of becoming a clinical or research associate since the ‘war in Vietnam made an appointment even more desirable …as service in [NIH] was accepted in lieu of a military obligation.’
Not only had Gallo been given an early start on the role of cholesterol in the degenerative diseases, but he also had the good fortune to develop an early interest in the thymus gland. The latter glandular structure of largely lymphoid tissue with its critical role in the maintenance of the immune system was the key to a growing understanding of how that immune system could be compromised and so open the victim up to assault by opportunistic and normally innocuous diseases. It was to become a part of the Special Virus Leukemia/ Lymphoma Program [SVLP] which possibly grew out of MK-SVLP and which finally emerged as SVCP. A co-incidence? Oh what tangled webs…
Following Providence College, in 1965 Robert Gallo joined the National Institutes of Health. Things were beginning to boom at NIH. The effects of the Lyndon Johnson drive towards population control, with his appointment of John David Rockefeller lll as a co-chair of a special committee was accompanied by dramatic increases in funding for activity in that field. It was in 1965 that the SVLP got its official funding with $8.7 million and this shot up to $13.5 million by the next year. Something dramatic was going on and in Virus Hunting Gallo does his best to obfuscate just what that something was! In fact, trying to follow the action as Gallo recounts it is something like trying to track footprints through a bog.
An Interlude
In 1964 NIH launched what they officially called a ‘Viral Oncology Program’ [VCO] but NIH labeled it simply ‘VO’ in their public references and funded it with $4.9 million. This program was apparently initiated so that there was an executive agency which would lay the foundation for bringing all the pieces of the Koprowski, Huebner, Deinhardt, Sigurdsson, Henles’ research together and translate it into a program to produce a smallpox vaccine as a carrier for Huebner’s mycoplasma and Sigurdsson’s visna virus. The visna having been passaged through cows to emerge as bovine leukemia virus [BLV].
The VOP lasted for four years, but in its second year an offshoot called The Special Virus Leukemia/ Lymphoma Program [SVLP](note BLV above) was created with a budget of $8.7 million. The ‘leukemia/ lymphoma’ emphasis of course, ties together much of what the listed researchers were ‘publicly’ working on. SVLP lasted for three years, but in 1968 was converted to the Special Virus Cancer Program [SVCP]. At this point we can repeat a quotation from Lyndon Johnson:
“When I entered office we were investing $6 million annually for population control. During my last year in the White House (1968) that investment had grown to $115 million.”
In that last year that Johnson refers to, the official spending on the Special Virus Programs totaled $18.7 million. Where did the other $100 million (approximately) go? In response to this question, one needs to read further in Johnson’s autobiography. In the same chapter [15] he tells how he was able to funnel funds through the Agency for International Development [AID] which had been working with the CDC on African ‘health’ projects. Here it must be noted that Bill Foege of the AID-CDC African health projects became a key administrator when Donald Henderson launched the revived 1966 WHO smallpox program.
Convoluted? Yes, indeed, but one doesn’t set out to kill off 8,000 people a day in broad daylight (as is happening today) without doing everything possible to cover one’s tracks. So, bear with the VOP to VO to SVLP to VCP to SVCP labyrinth. It was meant to confuse you, but don’t let it! Follow the money.
End of an Interlude
So, back to Gallo.
In 1965 Gallo joined the NIH, and lo and behold… who else was a member of that burgeoning ‘health’ agency? None other than Robert Huebner who had got a lot of the action under way in the late 1940’s when he tied the degeneration of adenoids to the mycoplasma. Huebner had first joined the Infectious Disease Institute of NIH but transferred to Gallo’s Cancer Institute in 1971.
Not only was the NCI of the NIH growing in terms of personnel, but there was a physical plant growth as well, which coincided with Gallo’s arrival. It was decided in 1964 to build another office/laboratory complex to be called ‘Building 41’ (all NIH buildings were numbered for their place in the sequence of additions to the campus). Here again, there is a small detail to be noted: corresponding as it does with the launch of the SVLP, it is significant that Building 41 was referred to by NIH staffers as “The Germ Warfare Facility”.
Despite the fact that Bldg. 41 was commonly referred to as the ‘germ warfare facility’ and is even referred to that way in Robert A. Weinberg’s book Racing to the Beginning of the Road. there is no hint in Virus Hunting that Gallo had any clue that the building was even there nor had he any clue as to what was going on.
The NCI/NIH interest in Huebner’s mycoplasma is also evident in the outside research that they financed. For example, in 1965 NIH awarded a contract to Michael Gabridge and William Murphy of the University of Michigan [Contract SVLP: PH43-65-639] The subject of the Gabridge/ Murphy research was “Toxic Membrane Fractions from Mycoplasma fermentans”! For more detail on why this research is critical to any study of AIDS, see Exhibit Two in this Special Edition of JODD. In a Patent that Lo filed for the U.S. Government this mycoplasma is postulated as a co-factor in AIDS.
Also relevant was the fact that at this same time Dr. Leonard Hayflick, over at the Wistar Institute [one of the Koprowski Krowd] produced a study called “The Mycoplasma and Human Leukemia”.
Another important personnel addition to the NCI/NIH research group was Sol Spiegelman who joined in 1969. In this series of precis articles from the outline of our work-in-progress, The Crime Beyond Belief, we cannot go into detail about Spiegelman’s work, but to give you an idea we refer to the SVCP Progress Report #8, page 324. Here it is noted that Spiegelman co-authored a research report titled: “DNA polymerase activities in virions of VISNA VIRUS”
Another Gallo- Spiegelman link that is significant to our study is a biologist named Arsene Burny. Gallo introduces Burny as a ‘member’ of the Spiegelman ‘group’. For our purposes we need to note that Burny had first worked in Belgium [see article above: “The Belgians and the Portuguese”]. His special field was bovine leukemia virus [BLV], which is what Gallo was working with, but which he disingenuously named HTLV-1.Furthermore, Burny was a co-author with Spiegelman on the visna article noted above.
We could go on with more examples about the Gallo years at NIH, but we have made our point: when one looks behind Gallo’s obfuscating and selective details, one finds solid links to the mycoplasma and the visna virus that we started with.
An Interlude
Peter Dale Scott is an ex-patriot Canadian now living in California. Professor Scott has coined the phrase ‘negative template’ to refer to key details that are omitted in any so-called account of some event. Don’t look exclusively at those things that are revealed, suggests this profound scholar, look instead for the details that are omitted, if you wish to find the full story.
End of an Interlude
‘Negative template’ could be Robert Gallo’s middle name. One example out of many will illustrate what we mean.
In 1970 Gallo co-authored an article with Stringner S. Yang and Robert C. Ting. The title of the article is “RNA Dependent DNA Polymerase of Human Acute Leukemic Cells”. Gallo, in his Virus Hunting alludes to Ting, but makes no mention of Yang. No apparent problem there.
However, there is a problem in the fact that both Yang and Ting worked for Bionetics Research Laboratories and at the time Bionetics was a biological weapons contractor to the United States Government. Nowhere in the index of Gallo’s misinformative book does Bionetics or its principal, Litton Industries, appear. Again, Gallo deals with suggestive material simply by leaving out all possibly compromising references to such.
The fact is this: all the evidence that we have been able to seek out in the countless documents that are our source, makes it clear that Robert Gallo was the man with one foot in the government camp and one foot in the industrial camp, where he was charged with the responsibility for producing a smallpox vaccine for WHO, designed to plant the co-factors of AIDS (the mycoplasma and the visna virus in its BLV variant) in as many people of the Third World as could be enticed to accept the American’ gift’. He was charged with the task of making all the research sound something like a great war on cancer, while he was actually carrying out a secret Rockefeller/ Kissinger war on humanity.
But, when in 1983 Dr. Luc Montagnier of the Pasteur Institute in Paris identified a particle in the blood of AIDS victims which he knew was related to the disease agent which causes lymphadenopathy in humans and which he linked to a retrovirus, he called it Lymphadenopathy Associated Virus [LAV] and so pushed Gallo to claim that he had already isolated the disease agent. Typical.
But, our focus is upon the negative templates that Professor Scott suggests we look for, and in Gallo’s career one can hardly see the forest for templates! We can’t summarize the Gallo/ Bionetics collaboration here for lack of space, but we develop the criminal conspiracy in extensive detail in our forthcoming book The Crime Beyond Belief. In the meantime readers can refer to Leonard Horowitz dramatic book Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola pages 79 to 84 for an excellent summary of much of what Gallo leaves out of his creative writing exercise.

AIDS: Made in America part 8

The Rockefellers’
Stable of Talent
‘Are you there, Henry?’

On page 83 of The New York Times edition of The White House Transcripts the following conversation between President Richard Nixon and White House Legal Counsel, John Dean is reported:
“President: Hoover to Coyne to Nelson Rockefeller to Kissinger. Right?
“Dean: That’s right.
“President: Why did Coyne tell it to Nelson Rockefeller?”
Here one has the very image of democracy in America.
Dean and the president have been trying to track down the route by which conversations exchanged in the confidence of the Oval Office have become known to persons who were not present at the time they were made.
The presence of Hoover, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in ‘the loop’ is no surprise to Nixon. After all, this corrupt and evil guardian of the law in the United States at the time was known to have spies and sources everywhere so that he could maintain his blackmail files and keep his great Washington power. And ‘Coyne’, probably Ed Coyne of the Wall Street Journal, was no great surprise… he was known to have back channels to many Washington insiders, but, the fact that Coyne brought Nelson Rockefeller in to the loop seems to catch Nixon by surprise: “Why did Coyne tell it to Nelson Rockefeller?”
The exchange between Dean and the president is significantly informative on a number of fronts. First of all, the fact that not only had Hoover learned of the matter under review, he had shared it with a member of the media. Then, not only did the media member have the information as background for any stories that he might see fit to use, he had also passed the information to none other than Nelson Rockefeller!
In other words, the information had been passed up the ladder to a key member of the Rockefeller power center, demonstrating just who it was in the democracy of the United States that was at the center of the shadow government which was really running things. Even Nixon didn’t know.
Then, it is important to note where the information went when Rockefeller had it: Henry Kissinger. Up to the top, Nelson Rockefeller, then out to the Rockefellers’ man in the White House: Henry Kissinger.
We introduce this chapter with this snippet from history to demonstrate where the real power lies in American politics: the money interests who have corrupted senior administration officials (Hoover); who have representatives of the fabled ‘free press’ as intelligence gatherers (Ed Coyne); and who control the president’s senior executor in all matters dealing with National Security (Henry Kissinger).
The power core of the United States is built upon wealth, which controls the media, the medical establishment, the pharmaceutical industry, the military industrial complex, the ‘public’ politicians, American foreign policy (including that instrument of foreign policy… the making of war).
And the core of the wealthy establishment is the Rockefeller network.
The wars that the American people have allowed themselves to wage on behalf of the wealth power core, including that in Vietnam for tin and tungsten; that in the Middle East for oil; and finally, that secret war in Africa for that continent’s great untapped resource base, and employing the de-population weapon of AIDS, have all been contrived by the lackeys of great wealth, and in 1973 when Nixon was being double-crossed while himself double-crossing others, the flow of information was to Nelson Rockefeller and from him it went to Henry…’Are you there, Henry?’
So, the major stud in the Rockefeller stable of talent, was Henry Kissinger, but we’ll leave him to the end of this article. Let’s start back in 1943 in Brazil where the Rockefellers ruled supreme. Who was in the stable there?
Edwin Lennette worked at the Yellow Fever Research Service in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, for, nominally, the Brazilian Ministry of Health and the Rockefeller Foundation. One of his areas of research was an investigation of encephalitis. One of the experiments he participated in involved the Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis virus [VEEV]. Thus, Lennette was right in on the ground floor of biowar weapons research for, when Dr. MacArthur of the Pentagon was briefing the Congressmen about Pentagon research in that field, on June 9, 1969,he was asked what pathogens were being worked on. MacArthur replied: “…Incapacitating agent (among others): Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis virus (and) Lethal: Yellow fever virus”!
Hillary Koprowski turned up in Brazil in 1940, where he, too, worked for the Rockefeller Foundation! One of his fellow researchers was Edwin Lennette, and consequently, one of his areas of expertise was VEEV, which, as one author points out was later put to use in the development of a vaccine by Koprowski and the U.S. Army and whose potential as a ‘biological warfare agent was swiftly recognized.’ In 1944, Koprowski used his Rockefeller links to immigrate to the U.S. where he first worked for the Rockefeller Institute. Then, he went to Lederle Laboratories and association with Herald Cox, whom we have already met. [We have noted elsewhere that the disease pathogen Coxiella burnettii had been named in honour of Herald Cox and Frank Burnet. C. Burnettii, in turn, is the causative factor in Queensland fever (Q fever) and the latter was also identified by MacArthur in his report to Congress, as a ‘disabling’ bioagent being worked on by the Pentagon.]
From Lederle and some early and mysterious trips to Belgium and the Congo, Koprowski arrived at the Wistar Institute and was a part of much that followed.
Meanwhile, in another part of the stable, Dr. Bjorn Sigurdsson was also working for the Rockefellers. In the early 1940’s Sigurdsson was working at the Rockefeller Institute in New Jersey. Later, with hundreds of thousands of Rockefeller dollars he returned to his native Iceland, to study ‘experimental pathology’. He was just in time to experience the first major outbreak of a mysterious ‘incapacitating’ disease agent that hit over 1000 Icelandic students, five of whom developed Parkinson’s Disease and later died. From there he went on to study the nature of the sheep retroviruses, which co-incidentally, are a major component of the ‘lethal’ disease pattern called HIV-1, and which by being able to take over the reproductive mechanism of its host cell [RNA-directed DNA polymerase], can perpetuate itself in its victim.
In the 1970’s Fritz Deinhardt looms very large in the Special Virus Cancer Program. In Progress Report #8 alone, he is cited 19 times. An expert, it would seem, in cancer. But, it wasn’t always so. In fact, back in 1958 the record shows that he was a great colleague of Hilary Koprowski, and, when Hilary was in the Congo testing something on chimpanzees at Camp Lindi, there also was Fritz Deinhardt plying the poor chimps with a hepatitis vaccine that he was researching. Of special interest to us in this precis about AIDS, was that part of Deinhardt’s work focused upon the role of hormones in contagious liver diseases. This research becomes even more pertinent when one has a chance to study the SVCP, Progress Report #9, for in the latter document the following is reported as an important discovery:
“We have for the first time demonstrated that the virogenic markers, group specific antigens (g.s.) and RNA directed DNA polymerase, can be activated by alteration of the physiological endocrine balance.”
What is so relevant about this discovery (made for the first time!)?
To begin with, the ‘endocrine balance’ has to do with the role of the hormones, and the role of the hormones has everything to do with the ability of certain mycoplasmal species to alter that endocrine balance. Here is how it works: 1. When roused to action by some trauma, certain mycoplasma will up-take pre-formed cholesterol from its host cell. Cholesterol, in turn, is antecedent to the production of hormones in certain secretory glands. If the cholesterol supply is limited due to mycoplasmal up-take, then the supply of certain hormones is ipso facto also limited. Hence, the significance of Deinhardt’s hormone research vis a vis hormone balance, hepatitis, and chimps in the Congo. [See the article in this issue: “Robert Gallo; ‘Thanks Luc.’” and note how cholesterol figures in mycoplasma infection.]
However, of significance to us at this point is the fact that Deinhardt’s work was to a large part financed by the Rockefeller Foundation.
Put Fritz Deinhardt in to the Rockefeller stable of talent.
We have noted elsewhere in this Special Edition of JODD, the role of certain Belgian scientists in a variety of Koprowski-related activities. However, we should take particular note of Dr. Ghislain Courtois. It turns out that in 1955, before embarking upon a vaccination program in Central Africa where the records of just what was being vaccinated against had been lost, Dr. Courtois was brought to America for a three month study session. He started this tour at the Rockefeller Institute in New York, then he continued his studies at Rockefeller-sponsored labs in Trinidad and Rio de Janeiro.
Then in 1958, a very critical year in the history of AIDS, Dr. Courtois visited the Wistar Institute for a training course. After this course, he traveled to Tulane University in New Orleans for further ‘study’. As we develop in greater detail in our work-in-progress, The Crime Beyond Belief, Tulane was a significant Rockefeller-dominated research center for biowar weapons development. However, at this time it is enough to note the large role played in the education of Dr. Courtois by the Rockefeller empire.
There are many others that we could cite whose activities had links with the Rockefellers. However, we trust that we have made our point: the whole story of AIDS cannot be told without someone from some part of the Rockefeller empire appearing in the narrative. Now, we will direct our attention to the most significant of the Rockefeller stable: Dr. Henry Kissinger.
In Kissinger, the rubber of eugenics theory meets the road of population control. The insidious presence of the Rockefellers is translated into the realpolitik of the Nixon administration and a number of threads of science and power lay the ground for 1981: the year when a disabling pathogen and a lethal pathogen are officially in the human family and the rate of population growth begins to slow. Although President Nixon is the passenger in the limousine and thinks that he is giving the orders, and Kissinger is the chauffeur at the wheel, the route has been set by Nelson Rockefeller and his family, through his friends in high places.
President: “Hoover to Coyne to Nelson Rockefeller to Kissinger. Right?”
“Are you there, Henry?”
Heinz (later changed to Henry) Alfred Kissinger was born on May 29, 1923, in Germany. In 1938 his family fled Germany for Britain and shortly after for the United States. In 1943 he was drafted into the U.S. Army where he played an unusually successful role as a district administrator in the occupation of his birth state. His major move towards a significant role in world affairs came in 1956 when Nelson Rockefeller appointed him a director of a Rockefeller Brothers Fund special project to study the major domestic and foreign problems of the United States. Essentially, he was to develop political positions for Nelson Rockefeller’s bid to become president of the U.S.
However, all of Rockefeller’s money and duplicity together with Kissinger’s insidious skills in manipulating those whom he targeted, were not enough to defeat Richard Nixon in the latter’s bid for the job. Early in 1968 it had become evident that Nixon was going to be the Republican Party’s choice as their candidate, and Rockefeller met with Nixon to strike a deal. Essentially the deal was this: Rockefeller would withdraw from the race and devote his money and media strength to the election of Nixon, if, in turn, Nixon would appoint Kissinger as his head of the National Security Council [NSC] when he had won the election. Nixon agreed, mainly to get Rockefeller into his tent during the campaign.
Thus it was that Kissinger became the Rockefeller’s man in the White House. Nelson Rockefeller had added the key stud to his stable of talent. As head of the NSC, Kissinger essentially controlled the Pentagon and the CIA and the great eugenics plan of the Rockefeller family became official (although publicly unstated) United States policy. The MK-SVLP sub-program of MKULTRA had become The Special Virus Leukemia/Lymphoma Program [SVLP] under Johnson when he appointed John David Rockefeller lll co-chair of his Population Control Committee, ending the Kennedy era opposition to the concept. Johnson had moved population control from the basement to the back kitchen. With Nixon’s designation of Kissinger as head of the NSC and as the president’s special assistant for security affairs, population control moved from the back kitchen to the living room. Under the guise of a great war against cancer, the Rockefeller man in the White House, Henry Kissinger, launched an all out attack upon the Third World’s people.
The WHO smallpox vaccination campaign, initiated on a trial basis in the mid-1950’s, and revived by the Johnson administration with its John D. Rockefeller lll and Wilbur Cohen Population Control Committee in 1966 went all out in late 1968 when Henry Kissinger came to dominate United States foreign policies on behalf of his Rockefeller patrons. Thus it was that on June 9, 1969, Dr. Donald MacArthur of the Pentagon was free to share in secret Hearings with several Congressmen the fact that ‘eminent scientists’ were ready to launch a double-barreled assault on the world’s population growth rate. One barrel would fire a disabling pathogen at the White population [CFS] and the other barrel would fire a lethal pathogen at the Black population [AIDS]
All that was needed was $10 million and from five to ten years time and by 1980 the Rockefeller/ Kissinger/ Pentagon/ NIH / CDC attack on population growth would be under way with the twin epidemics of AIDS and CFS.
An Interlude For Justice
At this point, we want to make sure that all of the people involved in this greatest crime in history, the death and disablement of millions of people from AIDS and CFS, is not laid completely at the door of Henry Kissinger. Kissinger was and is part of the executive branch of the eugenics war against humanity in general. He is not alone. In the core are the Rockefeller dominated industrialists, militarists, and media moguls. Around that core are the descending orders of support for the evil policies now at work. And, finally, there are the people of the United States who by a mix of mental lethargy, disinterest, misinformation, disinformation, ‘kick-butt’ mentality and self-centeredness have allowed themselves to become mankind’s’ greatest enemy rather than mankind’s’ best friend.
As part of this total plan are people such as Christopher Hitchens who, while appearing to condemn the evil, singles out Kissinger as the criminal for punishment. Hitchens, in his book The Trial of Henry Kissinger alludes to Nelson Rockefeller only three times en passant and David Rockefeller only twice. If one were to judge by Hitchens’ disinformation, Kissinger is the heart of darkness, was literally working alone, and he alone should be put on trial.
Don’t buy that crap.
Kissinger was and is just one stud in the Rockefeller stable. The stable owners (the Rockefellers and their cohorts); the pliant media assets (including The New York Times, Time, Readers Digest, and Science) which misinform and disinform; the bought politicians; and the public at large are all to varying degrees, complicit in making the United States of America the real ‘evil empire’.