The following article really tells us why we're in the mess were in in America. I applaude this gentleman's work.
http://www.blogger.com/profile/16312560191165755438
To anyone who studies memetics, it is painfully obvious that religions are meme complexes or parasitic mental processes which propagate in the same manner as chain letters. A meme operates as a chain letter, it has explicit instructions to propagate. It has no other reality except for its own survival and self replication thus it is analogous to a gene. A meme is a mind gene, just an idea real or not lodged in the human brain.
It can be easily shown that religious belief is a self-perpetuating delusion. A religious memeplex may be defined as a self-referential belief system which contains within itself the instructions for its own propagation. Memes are like biological viruses - harmful mental processes which use their hosts to infect others.
This essay’s purpose is to clearly show that the primary religious memes infecting America are harmful to our civilization.
Metaphysics of our imagined god.
1. That which we out picture as god becomes our god. Our anthromorphized god is simply the out picturing of ourselves. God of the Old Testament is angry and judgmental; God of the New Testament is loving and forgiving. God is our self-image, a mirror of our thoughts, wishes and intentions.
2. God is the viral infection we have self installed in our collective mind.
3. That which we resist persists. If we resist the devil we are drawn toward the devil until the devil becomes ourselves.
4. That which we believe is made manifest. If we believe in an angry judgmental god, we act angry and judgmental and thus take on the prime characteristics of the anti-god Satan.
5. Fear is the emotion opposite of love. So when a Christian fears the lord, he is actually fearing the devil. There is no reason to fear love. So when a Christian says 'fear the lord', they are actually worshipping fear and thus the Lord Satan unknowingly. The War on Terror is a fear based construct, we must attack them first or they'll get us, so fear based religions like Judaism and Christainity are naturally ok with the terror war, because it is only an outgrowth of their metaphysical fear mongering.
Evangelists, Mormons, Christians, Muslims, Catholics, and Jews are all the same basic memeplex with minor variants.
All the above named religions have adherents infected with almost identical death cult memes because all are rooted in Hebrew Old Testament memes. Most strongly believe that Satan is alive and well and running the world. Satan is a Jewish created myth and the indoctrinated are enlisted to help god save the souls from the unbelievers or heretics. Thus the only real relationship that can exist between the rival groups is war. History bears this out as fact, rival Jewish tribes kill one another, Catholics kill Protestants, Baptists fight other Baptists sects, yet all believe essentially the same doctrine.
In a recent Republican primary debate Mormon Mitt Romney passionately argued that we must attack Islam because militant Islam wants to take over the world. Romney is simply voicing his memetic instructions to propagate and preserve his faith destroying a rival meme. Memetically speaking, Romney is no different than the Islamic extremists he fears.
The Jews as a death cult.
The Hebrews (Jews) believe in a devil, a hell, eternal judgment, and an angry god. Satan is held as a real personality by the believers even though virtually no evidence exists to support the existence of a devil. In the modern era, all negative events can be attributed to chance or scientific processes. In other words the concept of Satan is an unproved meme. Even though we live in a scientific age, an unproven dangerous idea like a devil persists. You simply can’t be a Christian and not believe in a devil, he’s central to the thesis of eternal hell and suffering. If there were no hell or devil why would you need to be saved? Yet believing in such ideas creates those ideas in this realm because whatever we believe is made real.
Christianity as a Jewish black magic spell.
America is under a Jewish black magic spell because so many Americans are believing Christians. Millions of people believe we are in the ‘end times’; they look forward to the coming Apocalypse because they believe their god will return and save the earth. Christians deny their role in current events. They cannot see that their votes that put the new antichrist into power are primarily responsible for the Middle East violence. They deny that their beliefs are creating the Apocalypse, they believe god will have to return to save the earth from humans exercising free will.
Although Christians decry magic as a tool of Satan, the Jewish creators of Christianity are heavily into black magic and perfectly willing to deceive the non-Jews they have negatively slandered as goyim (cattle). Little do the Jews know that the spell they cast has created the characteristic of sheep that they so hungrily prey upon. The Middle East slaughter is the fruit of their black magic efforts of the Jewish lead neoconservative political movement that enlisted the Evangelical movement as their primary ally to wage a Middle East holocaust.
The War on Terror is a Jewish created myth.
Americans are being manipulated by the Jewish Neocon cabal into waging a War of Terror on Islam. Americans caught war fever after 911, an engineered psyops on the American mind. So the real reason evil men dominate America is because Americans can not see through the memetic veil to actually effect change. Americans know that they are in serious trouble as a nation but can not see that the change must come from within, Americans must transcend their false memetic beliefs or perish.
America is in a Jewish created death spiral.
Because America is dominated by Christians that beLIEve the Jew construct of reality, the Jews (Neocons) have foisted 911 and the War of Terror on America. As long as America is politically dominated by Christians, the Jews will be in control; as long as the Jews are in control they will squeeze every last drop of blood from America until she’s a withering corpse. The Federal Reserve and tax laws are simply tools being used to strip the wealth from the productivity of the mighty American Industrial empire. Now, for all to see, America is completely bankrupt – and not just fiscally, morally as well.
Satan is now the dominant GOD of the United States
The dominant group in America are Christian (80%) while the Jews constitute only 2%. So how is it that the 2% can so easily command the majority? The Christians are commanded by the God of the Bible to support his chosen people, the Jews, or face eternal damnation. Never mind the fact that the New Testament was written by Jews. Thus the Jews subconsciously dominate the memetically possessed Christians. Here’s the great irony, when Christians refer to the Lord the mistakenly mean Lord Satan because they associate fear with their god. The god of the Jews, LORD SATAN is the GOD of the American Evangelicals. Thus 4000 year old Jewish negativity has spiraled through time and is wrecking havoc in this age. Our Apocalyptic culture is directly tied to Jewish writings about the end times.
Many Americans have bought into Jewish memes of parasitic dominance, control of money, and information as propaganda. George Bush and Donald Rumsfeld are the goy wolves hiding the real Jewish perpetrators who like to remain behind the scenes manipulating the levers of power. To the even the most neutral observer it is the obvious from Jewish history that the Jews exist as parasite to every nation they occupy. Their racial tendency to milk the goy creates tremendous resentment amongst the host population until they are made slaves, killed or persecuted and then forced to flee. This is exactly what happened to the Jews in the 1930’s - a severe reaction by the Christian majority within post Weimer Germany was unleashed upon the Jews. Financial collapsing America is rapidly becoming a 'post Weimar' republic, as America wakes up they are going to figure out that the Jews were causal. Indeed, the neoconservatives are a subversive Jewish lead movement and the Federal Reserve is a private Jewish banking cartel.
Many authors have noted that the Jews have such an ingrained parasitic mentality that they could never exist without a host and that’s why modern Israel must get massive foreign aid from the United States to even exist as a viable state. (Note: Small minorities of Israelis have studied free markets and Libertarian principles and want independence from foreign aid and they actually detest their overbearing welfare socialistic state and would like to end it. In other words they have adopted new memes of self reliance and productivity.)
Modern Israelis are horrified of Ron Paul because he has vowed to cut off foreign aid to Israel. Here’s a speculative point, since host America is being bled to death by the monied Jewish banker parasite, aid will be eventually cut off by bankrupt America. Then antagonistic Israel will be forced to stand alone amongst her enemies. No doubt after the destruction the surviving Jews will rewrite history (once again) whining about their fate. Denial is not a river in Egypt.
Conclusion.
The only logical end for America is death because a death cult is in control of America. The primary media of the Untied States is the television and from this device, the Jewish owners have constructed a false paradigm in the minds of the unthinking indoctrinated sheeple of America. TV should be called the Jewtube because from it the Jews that structure American reality. One only has to tune into FOX (faux) network to hear the irrational diatribes and Jew hatreds spewing from the mouths of goyim stooges Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity. Meanwhile those who believe in the Bible sit dumbly and watch in glee reveling in their Biblical taught self hatred.
It would be my greatest wish that some dramatic shift in consciousness would save us from our rapidly approaching fate. Ain’t goyin’ to happen. So rejoice as the karmic loops of energy reach completion.
- Phishna
14 Jan 2008
ps - to read my other essays click on this link: http://www.blogger.com/profile/16312560191165755438
Posted by phishna at 12:59 PM
Sunday, September 28, 2008
Gore: 'It Is Time For Civil Disobedience'
Unfortunately it's for the wrong reasons. We should be disobedient that we are being destroyed by international financial elite. Meanwhile, Beginning Oct. 1 for 12 months, the 1st BCT will be under the day-to-day control of U.S. Army North, the Army service component of Northern Command, as an on-call federal response force for natural or manmade emergencies and disasters, including terrorist attacks. Gore is priming the pump for Marshall law.
Saturday, September 27, 2008
Consequence Management Response Force to join Army Northern Command
WASHINGTON (Army News Service, Sep. 15, 2008) -- As America remembers the anniversary of the terrorist attacks of 9/11, more than 800 members of a joint response force are preparing for their new mission of responding to CBRNE, or chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and high-yield explosive incidents.
Elements of the force, known as the CBRNE Consequence Management Response Force, or CCMRF, assembled at Fort Stewart, Ga., Sept. 8-19 for a command post exercise called Vibrant Response.
Three brigades form the core of the force: the 1st Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division, Fort Stewart; the 1st Medical Brigade, Fort Hood, Texas; and the 82nd Combat Aviation Brigade, Fort Bragg, N.C.
The response force will be assigned on Oct. 1 to U.S. Northern Command, Peterson Air Force Base, Colo., and placed under the operational control of U.S. Army North, Fort Sam Houston, Texas.
This week, Col. Lou Vogler, U.S. Army North's chief of future operations, and Marine Corps Lt. Col. James Shores, director of plans and policy for Joint Task Force Civil Support, participated in a round table interview with online journalists to discuss the force, including its unique mission and training.
"U.S. Army North is the Army component of U.S. Northern Command," said Vogler, "and we're charged with coordinating the federal military response in the land domain for domestic operations or disasters, to include CBRNE."
Vogler said that the response force is a scalable, dedicated force that is prepared to reinforce state and local responders when they request federal assistance. The force's alignment under U.S. NORTHCOM shortens the line of command to increase readiness and responsiveness.
Training is a key element of readying the force for its mission, and Vibrant Response offers the opportunity to train in a realistic scenario before a crisis or incident occurs.
During the exercise, commanders and staff of the force will train, rehearse and exercise - from academic classes to making decisions and executing orders - all to help prepare them for the mission they will assume on Oct. 1, said Vogler.
"It's an opportunity for network building in an unprecedented assignment of forces," said Shores. "DOD always had allocated contingency sourced forces - but this is precedent-setting network building with the forces that we ultimately will go out and execute with. It's an opportunity to get to know our forces, to see them in execution, to mission-orient them and be that much better - to be that much more responsive."
One goal of the exercise is to exercise with partners from the civilian agencies they would support. To that end, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and other interagency representatives are participating to ensure integration with civilian consequence managers who would lead a response, said Vogler.
"The overall federal response builds on the local and state response in accordance with the incident command system and existing plans and processes that are out there," said Vogler. "The response force would supplement local efforts."
The training allows planners and leaders to test and improve upon procedures from previous exercises and training.
When asked how responders were working to eliminate the communications difficulties of 9/11, Shores said that frequency management planning is a part of that training effort, and those issues are a part of the planning process.
Both Vogler and Shores reiterated the importance of training and planning to the success of the response force.
"We at Army North as the joint force land component command of NORTHCOM, and Joint Task Force Civil Support, as the standing CBRNE response headquarters, take this mission very seriously," said Vogler. "The assignment of the CCMRF just makes us that much more prepared in terms of having standing relationships and an ability to train with a specific force full-time, under the control of NORTHCOM, to ensure we are ready to respond. The force has always been in place, but now the relationships are closer than ever."
"This type of planning and coordination and training is a priority both in our headquarters and at NORTHCOM, as we understand our responsibilities to be ready should the requirement arise, God forbid," said Vogler.
Elements of the force, known as the CBRNE Consequence Management Response Force, or CCMRF, assembled at Fort Stewart, Ga., Sept. 8-19 for a command post exercise called Vibrant Response.
Three brigades form the core of the force: the 1st Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division, Fort Stewart; the 1st Medical Brigade, Fort Hood, Texas; and the 82nd Combat Aviation Brigade, Fort Bragg, N.C.
The response force will be assigned on Oct. 1 to U.S. Northern Command, Peterson Air Force Base, Colo., and placed under the operational control of U.S. Army North, Fort Sam Houston, Texas.
This week, Col. Lou Vogler, U.S. Army North's chief of future operations, and Marine Corps Lt. Col. James Shores, director of plans and policy for Joint Task Force Civil Support, participated in a round table interview with online journalists to discuss the force, including its unique mission and training.
"U.S. Army North is the Army component of U.S. Northern Command," said Vogler, "and we're charged with coordinating the federal military response in the land domain for domestic operations or disasters, to include CBRNE."
Vogler said that the response force is a scalable, dedicated force that is prepared to reinforce state and local responders when they request federal assistance. The force's alignment under U.S. NORTHCOM shortens the line of command to increase readiness and responsiveness.
Training is a key element of readying the force for its mission, and Vibrant Response offers the opportunity to train in a realistic scenario before a crisis or incident occurs.
During the exercise, commanders and staff of the force will train, rehearse and exercise - from academic classes to making decisions and executing orders - all to help prepare them for the mission they will assume on Oct. 1, said Vogler.
"It's an opportunity for network building in an unprecedented assignment of forces," said Shores. "DOD always had allocated contingency sourced forces - but this is precedent-setting network building with the forces that we ultimately will go out and execute with. It's an opportunity to get to know our forces, to see them in execution, to mission-orient them and be that much better - to be that much more responsive."
One goal of the exercise is to exercise with partners from the civilian agencies they would support. To that end, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and other interagency representatives are participating to ensure integration with civilian consequence managers who would lead a response, said Vogler.
"The overall federal response builds on the local and state response in accordance with the incident command system and existing plans and processes that are out there," said Vogler. "The response force would supplement local efforts."
The training allows planners and leaders to test and improve upon procedures from previous exercises and training.
When asked how responders were working to eliminate the communications difficulties of 9/11, Shores said that frequency management planning is a part of that training effort, and those issues are a part of the planning process.
Both Vogler and Shores reiterated the importance of training and planning to the success of the response force.
"We at Army North as the joint force land component command of NORTHCOM, and Joint Task Force Civil Support, as the standing CBRNE response headquarters, take this mission very seriously," said Vogler. "The assignment of the CCMRF just makes us that much more prepared in terms of having standing relationships and an ability to train with a specific force full-time, under the control of NORTHCOM, to ensure we are ready to respond. The force has always been in place, but now the relationships are closer than ever."
"This type of planning and coordination and training is a priority both in our headquarters and at NORTHCOM, as we understand our responsibilities to be ready should the requirement arise, God forbid," said Vogler.
Friday, September 26, 2008
Pentagon officials admitted that it was Georgian army that started the hostilities attacking South Ossetia.
U.S. Examined Beginning of War
http://kommersant.com/p1024013/South_Ossetia_hearings_in_Congress/
// But didn’t overhaul its relations with Russia
The U.S. Senate and House of Representatives held hearings on the recent war in Georgia. During the debates high-ranking State Department and Pentagon officials actually admitted that it was Tbilisi that started the hostilities attacking South Ossetia. This said, Washington virtually acknowledged the chronology Russia regards real. However, it would be untimely for Moscow to triumph. American military and diplomats still consider Russia’s reaction “disproportionate” calling on to counter the Kremlin’s “imperial reach”.
First the developments in the Caucasus were thrashed out in the Senate Standing Committee on Armed services. Eric S. Edelman, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy (Department of Defense), and Daniel Fried, the Assistant Secretary at Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs (Department of State) were invited to participate in the discussion. Mr Edelman’s address was the most surprising. “Although much is still unclear, it appears the Georgians conducted what they thought was a limited military operation with the political aim of restoring Georgian sovereignty over South Ossetia,” he told the Senators. “The Georgian leadership’s decision to employ force in the conflict zone was unwise. The use of artillery fire and multiple launched rockets into urban areas and into the proximity of Russian peacekeepers is lamentable, and we do not condone this activity.”
It’s the first time the U.S. recognized at the high level that Georgia unleashed hostilities in South Ossetia. Earlier only U.S. Ambassador in Moscow John Beyrle made this the point in his August interview with Kommersant, “Russia’s troops reasonably responded to the assault on the Russian peacekeepers in South Ossetia.”
However, admitting Georgia’s attack on Tskhinvali, Washington doesn’t renounce its view of Russia’s line as “aggressive”. “The U.S. shows support for Georgia’s security, independence, and territorial integrity. U.S. policy is to demonstrate to Russia that its aggressive actions do not serve its national interest, will not be tolerated, and will not be cost free,” Mr Edelman stated.
The debate in the House Committee on Foreign Affairs was even more heated. In his opening statement, Chairman Howard L. Berman lashed out at the Russian government, which “over the last few months sought to provoke Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili through an escalating series of questionable legal and military actions”. “Russia established official ties with the separatist government in Abkhazia, issuing passports and citizenship to its residents. Then Moscow deployed railway troops to Abkhazia under dubious pretenses,” the Congressman said adding, nonetheless, that “President Saakashvili’s decision to take Russia’s bait and to engage militarily was a terrible blunder”.
Then Daniel Fried took the floor. “Russia sent its army across an internationally recognized boundary, to attempt to change by force the borders of a country with a democratically-elected government and, if possible, overthrow that government – not to relieve humanitarian pressures on Russian citizens, as it claimed,” that’s how the diplomat described the cause for the conflict. Passing on to the measures the U.S. may undertake to influence Russia, the Assistant Secretary dropped a hint that Russia might have problems with international organizations. According to him, the U.S. with its European allies should put “pressure on Russia to adhere to the Ceasefire”. One of the U.S. objectives “is to prevent Russia from drawing a line down the center of Europe and declaring that nations on the wrong side of that line belong to Moscow’s “sphere of influence” and therefore cannot join the great institutions of Europe and the transatlantic family”.
Dana Rohrabacher, Rep., disagree with such an approach. “All intelligence sources I contacted confirm that the recent hostilities in Georgia and its breakaway provinces were started by Georgia,” he stated. “Russians hold true. Georgians started it all. Russians put an end to it.” From the Congressman’s viewpoint, “The U.S. contrived to represent Russia as a foe throwing it in Iran’s arms.”
After it Daniel Fried was asked a multitude questions whether the U.S. possesses data revealing the chronology of the conflict. He had to acknowledge that he didn’t have accurate data. “Georgians thought Russians were in the Roki Tunnel as they took the decision to attack Tskhinvali. As far as I understand, Georgians thought they told us the truth,” he replied cautiously. “But I can’t say that I know it from independent sources that the Georgian party’s statements are trustworthy.”
Howard Berman summed it up to Kommersant after the discussion was over, “I can’t get it right – why no Washington bigwig went to Moscow.”
http://kommersant.com/p1024013/South_Ossetia_hearings_in_Congress/
// But didn’t overhaul its relations with Russia
The U.S. Senate and House of Representatives held hearings on the recent war in Georgia. During the debates high-ranking State Department and Pentagon officials actually admitted that it was Tbilisi that started the hostilities attacking South Ossetia. This said, Washington virtually acknowledged the chronology Russia regards real. However, it would be untimely for Moscow to triumph. American military and diplomats still consider Russia’s reaction “disproportionate” calling on to counter the Kremlin’s “imperial reach”.
First the developments in the Caucasus were thrashed out in the Senate Standing Committee on Armed services. Eric S. Edelman, the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy (Department of Defense), and Daniel Fried, the Assistant Secretary at Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs (Department of State) were invited to participate in the discussion. Mr Edelman’s address was the most surprising. “Although much is still unclear, it appears the Georgians conducted what they thought was a limited military operation with the political aim of restoring Georgian sovereignty over South Ossetia,” he told the Senators. “The Georgian leadership’s decision to employ force in the conflict zone was unwise. The use of artillery fire and multiple launched rockets into urban areas and into the proximity of Russian peacekeepers is lamentable, and we do not condone this activity.”
It’s the first time the U.S. recognized at the high level that Georgia unleashed hostilities in South Ossetia. Earlier only U.S. Ambassador in Moscow John Beyrle made this the point in his August interview with Kommersant, “Russia’s troops reasonably responded to the assault on the Russian peacekeepers in South Ossetia.”
However, admitting Georgia’s attack on Tskhinvali, Washington doesn’t renounce its view of Russia’s line as “aggressive”. “The U.S. shows support for Georgia’s security, independence, and territorial integrity. U.S. policy is to demonstrate to Russia that its aggressive actions do not serve its national interest, will not be tolerated, and will not be cost free,” Mr Edelman stated.
The debate in the House Committee on Foreign Affairs was even more heated. In his opening statement, Chairman Howard L. Berman lashed out at the Russian government, which “over the last few months sought to provoke Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili through an escalating series of questionable legal and military actions”. “Russia established official ties with the separatist government in Abkhazia, issuing passports and citizenship to its residents. Then Moscow deployed railway troops to Abkhazia under dubious pretenses,” the Congressman said adding, nonetheless, that “President Saakashvili’s decision to take Russia’s bait and to engage militarily was a terrible blunder”.
Then Daniel Fried took the floor. “Russia sent its army across an internationally recognized boundary, to attempt to change by force the borders of a country with a democratically-elected government and, if possible, overthrow that government – not to relieve humanitarian pressures on Russian citizens, as it claimed,” that’s how the diplomat described the cause for the conflict. Passing on to the measures the U.S. may undertake to influence Russia, the Assistant Secretary dropped a hint that Russia might have problems with international organizations. According to him, the U.S. with its European allies should put “pressure on Russia to adhere to the Ceasefire”. One of the U.S. objectives “is to prevent Russia from drawing a line down the center of Europe and declaring that nations on the wrong side of that line belong to Moscow’s “sphere of influence” and therefore cannot join the great institutions of Europe and the transatlantic family”.
Dana Rohrabacher, Rep., disagree with such an approach. “All intelligence sources I contacted confirm that the recent hostilities in Georgia and its breakaway provinces were started by Georgia,” he stated. “Russians hold true. Georgians started it all. Russians put an end to it.” From the Congressman’s viewpoint, “The U.S. contrived to represent Russia as a foe throwing it in Iran’s arms.”
After it Daniel Fried was asked a multitude questions whether the U.S. possesses data revealing the chronology of the conflict. He had to acknowledge that he didn’t have accurate data. “Georgians thought Russians were in the Roki Tunnel as they took the decision to attack Tskhinvali. As far as I understand, Georgians thought they told us the truth,” he replied cautiously. “But I can’t say that I know it from independent sources that the Georgian party’s statements are trustworthy.”
Howard Berman summed it up to Kommersant after the discussion was over, “I can’t get it right – why no Washington bigwig went to Moscow.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)